Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Could anyone point me to reliable resources (or share experience) on using 500T unfiltered in daylight and then correcting in post?

I'm finding contradictory information, ranging from "massive latitude, easy to correct" to "rate at 400 or lower, some blue cast will always remain".

Many thanks!

 

 

  • Site Sponsor
Posted

As long as you expose it within a reasonable range, say +1 over it is usually able to be balanced to more or less normal. The daylight will overexpose the blue record faster than the red and green thus the blue skewed cast when shot under daylight.

Posted

I can't speak with authority here. But I remember someone saying that you should use a filter when shooting tungsten film in daylight, otherwise some of your colours will be wrong, even with a proper white balance in post.

My opinion: make your life easy, and use a filter.

  • Site Sponsor
Posted
4 hours ago, Karim D. Ghantous said:

I can't speak with authority here. But I remember someone saying that you should use a filter when shooting tungsten film in daylight, otherwise some of your colours will be wrong, even with a proper white balance in post.

My opinion: make your life easy, and use a filter.

An 85 is the correction filter for Tungsten under daylight it will balance out the tungsten stock to normal. They come in 85 and 85 with ND.

Posted
16 hours ago, Uli Meyer said:

Shot on 200T with no 85 filter:

 

I remember this. Loved it. It looks great.

8 hours ago, David Mullen ASC said:

Michael Mann's "Heat" was shot in daylight without the correction filter on tungsten-balanced film.

Well, there you go. I think it's case closed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...