Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

My first instinct is that it's some kind of generative AI prompt trickery being applied to a still photo. The way that everything distorts is quite uncanny. The subject seems to be able to change facial features with ease while the older person in the background remains completely motionless mid-step.

This is supported by the fact that she makes the Glico mascot "run" around 0:20. The weird motion interpolation of the animated legs is an absolute giveaway.

If I were to recreate this shot without AI, I would film it in reverse at 60 frames per second (starting with the camera making contact with the glass and rapidly pulling out). I'd have to be somewhat mindful about any pedestrians in the background, as they will appear to be walking backwards after the footage is reversed.

I would reduce the speed of my clip to whatever my timeline is (24 or 30 frames per second) in my editor. The clinking sound would be added in post.

  • Like 1
Posted
12 hours ago, Roger Hallaway said:

the older person in the background remains completely motionless mid-step.

I think that person is moving- try a frame-by-frame.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Roger Hallaway said:

My first instinct is that it's some kind of generative AI prompt trickery being applied to a still photo. The way that everything distorts is quite uncanny. 

If I were to recreate this shot without AI, I would film it in reverse at 60 frames per second (starting with the camera making contact with the glass and rapidly pulling out). I'd have to be somewhat mindful about any pedestrians in the background, as they will appear to be walking backwards after the footage is reversed.

I would reduce the speed of my clip to whatever my timeline is (24 or 30 frames per second) in my editor. The clinking sound would be added in post.

Hmm, interesting.

I'm not completely convinced it's AI considering how the YouTuber tends to create his other videos (though you could be spot on about the Glico mascot), but I think you're on to something with the the reverse 60 frames. What I noticed is that the building behind her is in sharper focus than her, which could make sense if you were filming it in reverse and the first thing the phone autofocuses to after pulling away from the beer glass is the details in the building.

Could the uncanny distortion also be a result of a warp stabilization + a digital zoom interacting with a manual push out?

Also, why would it be your first instinct to do it in reverse? Just a matter of easier timing and choreography?

Thanks for your response!

Edited by Andrew Ko
Posted

Hey, i think it's got more to do with the motion? I think he is coming into the glass and maybe there is some sort of tracking? But there is defs an added affect of blur and motion in the edit. 

I actually screen recorded and rewatching it frame by frame, and i think it's just really good editing with blur and scaling! 

Hope this helps 🙂

  • Like 1
Posted
20 hours ago, Jalil James said:

Hey, i think it's got more to do with the motion? I think he is coming into the glass and maybe there is some sort of tracking? But there is defs an added affect of blur and motion in the edit. 

I actually screen recorded and rewatching it frame by frame, and i think it's just really good editing with blur and scaling! 

Hope this helps 🙂

Ahh, interesting. Thanks for your reply!

  • Upvote 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...