Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Premium Member
Posted

I believe your link is referencing another story - but from my read of that movie on your title, I think there's alot of tech-based approach due to the crypto topic in hand - they posited that the movie would have cost 300 Millions if shot on location, but I'm a bit skeptical of the premise that the production actually needs to fly and shoot to all those unnamed locations.

Found a link here:

https://nofilmschool.com/doug-liman-ai-movie

I smell  "Let's promote some A.I company" vibes that uses fancy machinery - but I could be wrong.

  • Upvote 1
  • Premium Member
Posted

Yea, volumetric sets never really took off in the way people thought they would. Frankly, I would vastly prefer a 180 degree volume set managed by AI, but the shot made in camera, to entirely fabricated in post production AI nonsense. There is no reason outside of literal laziness, that they couldn't have shot with a volumetric set and some little set pieces like door frames/walls and some interface pieces like tables and chairs. A clever set designer could easily make it happen and recycle props as the production goes on. I guess 20 days was their budget and they just didn't have enough time to make new props? 

  • Premium Member
Posted (edited)

They are probably trying to find the lowest passable treshold value for content. If people still accept it then they will produce tons more of the cheapest slop.

Kind of same like those AI generated Peppa Pig scam videos on youtube where the characters are doing something random for couple of seconds and then scene changes and again couple of random seconds of nonsense and changing again because that is all they could generate for cheap. 

Freakin street vendors selling worse and worse quality items every day, finally trying to sell you rocks and then if still not buying anything they want you to pay them money so that they would leave you alone. 

Scamming is the king, not content

 

Edited by Aapo Lettinen
  • Upvote 1
Posted

I mean this is just a film being shot on volume. It’s not the first … maybe it’s the largest scope all shot on volume?

 

it still takes lots of departments and expertise and lighting skill…you certainly still use some movie lights and work with the volumes projection to light with. 

Posted

It's not the Volume. They're not using an LED stage from what I understand, just a depressing gray backroom.

 

Also, $70M? That sounds extremely fishy to me. Kenneth Branagh's Hamlet is a period epic with 7 Oscar winning actors shot entirely on 70mm film. It's also 4 hours long.

Adjusted for inflation, Hamlet cost $37M.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...