Jump to content

Xenon lights and when to use them


Lindsay Mann

Recommended Posts

  • Premium Member

I never read much about these lights, and I can't find a lot of info on them. The only setup I know of is in my Reflections book where Owen Roizman uses one for a commercial. He sends it through a window and bounces it camera right into his subject. He's also got an 8k HMI to fill the window though.

 

My question is, what exactly is the light quality of a xenon? Is the 2k xenon Roizman used an HMI? It says it is daylight balanced, is this the case with all xenons? Is there a ballast? What sizes do these things come in and who makes them?

 

I'm also curious, because I've read that a lot of DP's much prefer the look of a tungsten unit on their subject's face. Is this because it creates more natural flesh tones? Is the quality of the bounced xenon on a face any different from a bounced HMI? Aside from that the xenon will be much much harder. I mean I know I've shot some faces in front of headlights and they don't look great. Then again I'm not Owen Roizman. Damn.

 

That's a lot of questions, sorry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Xenons are great lights for certain things. An not so great for others.

 

They are daylight and have a great focusable beam. Much like a searchlight. In fact you may see them in the 2k range or so on helicopters. But I think they are available up to 8k. Maybe more. I just haven't used larger than that myself

 

Their strongest asset is that if you really need a beam of light, it has a sharp beam, unlike a a par without a lens that has a fairly intense beam, but it is not sharp.

 

They can help create a sun lit look with an intense beam. I worked on I Am Legend recently where they were used to simulate sunlight coming from between buildings effectively.

 

You can see them on commercials and music video from time to time as well but usually for a specific reason.

 

They are not so great if you see the light's pattern on the wall or floor. It is kind of donut shaped with a hole in the middle and you can see the gas dancing about.

 

I have to say you can bounce them but they are not the best light to bounce. If you have to bounce them off something where there is no room for flags or cutters then perhaps they would be good use. Similiar to a leko but without actual blades. But most jobs do not carry them on a day to day basis.

 

In addition, they can be a little troublesome to operate and troubleshoot. The ballasts are very heavy and sometimes it is hard to get extra header.

 

Best

 

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I second all the above. I really like Xenons because I have found they are the best units to create what I call "chunks of sunlight", where you create a small, controlled bit of hard sunlight somewhere on the set.

 

The downsides are all the above, plus they are noisy and fairly massive. You can get newer Xenons with on board ballasts, but they all seem fairly prone to trouble. That said, I try to carry at least a 2k Xenon full time.

 

Here is an example of using one:

05.jpg

You can see the Xenon is the lower light. What I had was a 12k PAR being diffused to bring in the main light, and then the Xenon was to create a hard slash of light.

02.jpg

This is sort of the effect, the image is just a digital still taken before we were even done lighting, but you can see the Xenons effect on the guys hand and table.

03.jpg

And you can see the effect of the Xenon carry onto the frame left actor

04.jpg

 

Kevin Zanit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Wow. Awesome. Thanks.

 

I'm still curious about some DP's preference to use tungsten light on faces. I forget where I read this, but I'll try to find it. Maybe just because it's warmer. Or maybe it was fresnel lamps. I'll look it up.

 

The xenon seems great for the scene in which you used it, Kevin. Otherwise it seems unwieldy and just too hard to control for faces. Do people still have flicker problems with them even with square wave ballasts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I've never had a flicker problem with them. I don't find them any more unwieldy than a large HMI unit. I agree, I would not use them normally for a person's face. It is certainly not the most flattering light, not to mention how hot the light from Xenons are. That said, in that scene, sometimes the actors would catch a little Xenon on their face, and for the scene, it worked fine.

 

Some DPs like tungsten light because they like the quality of light a glowing filament produces more than they like the quality of light from HMIs. Personally, I do like Tungsten light a little more than HMI light, I just find it has a nice quality that is hard to describe.

 

I also like mixing large tungsten sources outside to add some warmth into the shadows:

 

07.jpg

(another digital still)

06.jpg

08.jpg

You can see a lot of HMI light, and then a 36-light Dino providing some warm fill.

 

Kevin Zanit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Thanks! I really didn't do anything to regulate the levels. It was very subtle even close to the frame. The fabric grid helps regulate it some as they get closer, but really I just set the warmth for their end mark and let them walk into it. It worked fine because, though the shot was a tracking shot, they ended up in a medium two shot by the end of the move, so you really don't notice the change in intensity. All that said, last I heard, this scene got cut from the film any ways, but at least it was good practice . . . ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

It's been a while (probably almost 10 years), but I believe I saw a 50k xenon on a commercial once. But after a quick Google search it seems like I might be wrong. The largest I found was a 10k. Regardless, xenon's are really just a specialty light and are great for situations like the one Kevin posted. The beam is so narrow it would be hard to light any more than a very small area with one, and there are much better lights for that anyway. Also, if I remember correctly, xenon's can only be tilted a very small amount, which can be an issue and force you to use mirrors to get the beam where you want it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Haha, feel free to spread the word about the size of my package . . . urrr lighting package ;)

 

Thanks Jonathan and everyone else. You can't find most of the stuff, hell I can't find most of it, I realized that while trying to assemble footage for a new reel.

 

In honesty, not very much of my narrative work is in distribution, and quite a lot of the stuff I have posted here is still in some various stage of post production. A lot of the stuff are shorts that have played in a few festivals but are not really available on DVD (at least not at the moment).

 

Most of the music video stuff I do makes its way onto the various music video outlets at some point or another, I usually will just randomly catch stuff I have shot.

 

I do carry a big lighting package whenever I can mainly because I just like a lot of options. Obviously budgets dictate how far we can push this. I do try to work within a budget and have good relationships with the people at the rental houses so that Frank (my gaffer) and I can work the pricing out as best as we can before production's eyes explode when they see the quotes (though they usually do no matter how high or low the price is).

 

Frank posts here, maybe he will have some input on this thread, you can see him in the picture with the dolly track, he is crossing it towards me, in all likelihood to punch me for pulling at this much light (4x18k + 12kPAR + 36k Dino, last setup of the day, at least we died small . . . ;) )

 

Kevin Zanit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
Their strongest asset is that if you really need a beam of light, it has a sharp beam, unlike a a par without a lens that has a fairly intense beam, but it is not sharp.

 

Hi Tim,

 

just to make sure, you mean a fresnel without a lens right? Not a PAR as most have the lens integrated into the globe? Or do you mean a HMI PAR with interchangeable lenses?

 

Cheers, Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey Dave,

 

I was referring to HMI par's that have interchangeable lenses. The only pars that have the lens integrated into the lens are tungsten par 64's and the like.

 

A fresnel with out a lens would be an open face. heheh. but some do like to open the door or take out a lens to get a shaper look. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.

 

And Brad is right, Xenons don't like to be tilted down very much. One needs to use mirrors but also lots of heat shield as they are hot and can bust glass very easily.

 

Best

 

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Strange. Reflections says, "Like the HMI the xenon oscillates at twice the power line frequency. If the power frequency fluctuates, there is a danger that flicker will occur in the image."

 

But if they only run on DC then it's not fluctuating. Right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Interesting, I have never over cranked with a Xenon, so I have no idea what the flicker situation is. I have noticed they tend to be finicky, every time I use one there seems to be a scramble at some point to figure out why the unit went down/ won't strike/ re-strike. They are the type of lights that when being used, are usually for very major strokes in the frame, and thus it would really bother me to light up a scene with one and then have it go down/ loose it for the scene. They are also just expensive enough/ too specialized to carry a backup of.

 

My gaffer started bringing in the Lekos with a 400W HMI Joker in them for creating a similar Xenon effect. I like them, but I don't like the color fringing at the edge of the beam. Also, the Mole Beams seem like a good solution, but they are pretty expensive as well.

 

Kevin Zanit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
Strange. Reflections says, "Like the HMI the xenon oscillates at twice the power line frequency. If the power frequency fluctuates, there is a danger that flicker will occur in the image."

 

I have now check Harry Box' Set Lighting Technician's Handbook, 3rd Ed. He says that Xenons run on pulsed DC too and that they are flicker free up to 10 000fps. He compares pulsed DC to a square wave current.

 

So, David, if you had flicker problems, maybe the ballast was broken and couldn't hold that pattern well?

 

Regards, Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have noticed they tend to be finicky, every time I use one there seems to be a scramble at some point to figure out why the unit went down/ won't strike/ re-strike.

 

Xenons are troublesome period. More so than HMI's. It is best to get backups if you can't get one back up.

 

Also when zeonons are shut down they should be given time for the cooling fans to cool the bulb before disconnecting the power

 

Tim

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
So, David, if you had flicker problems, maybe the ballast was broken and couldn't hold that pattern well?

 

The flicker was quite dramatic actually, I have no idea what happened, but I will shoot a test in the future if I want to shoot at non-safe speeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've found that Xenons are just interesting enough to justify all the trouble they bring. From my experience as well as the experience of some people I have talked to the type with ballasts on head are a little less finicky then those with separate ballasts. The particular model in the pictures Kevin posted is the Nexus II, which certainly had its quirks but was manageable. If you need the light to come strait down most places will rent you a special angled mirror that lets you accomplish this.

 

To get an idea of what kind of punch they pack check out some photometrics here. A 2k is about as bright as the sun at full spot from 50 feet away, granted only for a 24" beam diameter.

 

In regards to "Kevin's Package"... There's something either fantastic or absurd in using a light that takes four electricians to get up and and 36,000 watts to keep running as warm fill. If you ever hear "It's subtle but we like it." know that it's gaffer speak for "I'm sorry for making you get this light." ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...