Premium Member Tim O'Connor Posted January 27, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted January 27, 2008 A while ago I read a great article about Man Push Cart that talked extensively about how the DVX-100 was selected by the DP for budget and low light performance. Where? I've searched everywhere. It couid have been in "American Cinematographer", "Creative Cow", "DV" but I can't find it. I didn't hallucinate. I remember the pictures and the discussion of using the DVX-100. Well, I finally saw the Man Push Cart on DVD. I love it. It is too dark in places where I think they could have thrown in even a couple hundred watts of light somehow, despite their protestations on the commentary track but I still love this movie. The commentary track features the director, the D.P. and the lead actor. They sound like they have it together but they never mention what camera they used. At one point I think it's the director who says that they "shot in HD" but that's the only reference to anything in the realm of format/camera. Also, it's weird how they all constantly talk about "filming" in that conspicuously incorrect way that most of us were chastised not to do when we first started working and used the term generically for shooting until we were told unless there is film in that there camera; it's not "filming". After I saw the movie, I wanted to read as much as I could about how this movie was shot. I did a search and could find only one fleeting mention of Man Push Cart in a discussion of the new crop of movies at the time. I did NOT see that article in a dream. It was in a reputable publication and it discussed Man Push Cart being shot with a DVX-100. Does anybody know about this? By the way, although I do like the movie, and I understand the rationale for all the long lens shots as discussed on the commentary track, I think that without some wide shots there's no context to many of the scenes. That part drove me nuts. I wanted to scream at the tv for them to widen out at least once. Also it's weird how they say that they were two or three blocks away on many of their long lens shots. It doesn't sound like they say it in a figurative manner but unless they had a DVX-100 with a million to one zoom I'd say 40-50 feet would be more like it in most of those cases. They made a great movie although they say "filming" like high school students on the first day of tv class; they describe insane distance with the most literal deliveries and there is stuff in that movie that I did not see because of the lack of light until it was mentioned on the commentary track! Also, there are story points that are so subtly done that I definitely didn't get them until I heard on the commentary track "hope that people get this." Still, it's an impressive picture and I'd love to know the story if they shot it on Mini-DV! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Brad Grimmett Posted January 28, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted January 28, 2008 I read that article as well. I think it was in AC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tim O'Connor Posted January 28, 2008 Author Premium Member Share Posted January 28, 2008 I read that article as well. I think it was in AC. Thanks. I'm still searching. It's probably fallen behind a bookcase or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seamus Mulligan-Ferry Posted January 29, 2008 Share Posted January 29, 2008 AC, May 2006 (Mission Impossible III on the cover) in the "Points East" section. The article stated the DP, Michael Simmonds, pushed for HD over MiniDV, and was able to get it on the condition that his lighting budget was slashed/became non-existent. Simmonds shot with an F900 and essentially brought his lighting package in the trunk of car (china balls, small fresnels, plus a mini flo kit for inside the cart). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tim O'Connor Posted January 30, 2008 Author Premium Member Share Posted January 30, 2008 AC, May 2006 (Mission Impossible III on the cover) in the "Points East" section. The article stated the DP, Michael Simmonds, pushed for HD over MiniDV, and was able to get it on the condition that his lighting budget was slashed/became non-existent. Simmonds shot with an F900 and essentially brought his lighting package in the trunk of car (china balls, small fresnels, plus a mini flo kit for inside the cart). Wow, thanks so much. I've been going bananas. I know that I have that issue so I'll dig it out. Really appreciate it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now