Jump to content

Shooting Miniatures *NEED ADVICE/TIPS*


Michael Townley

Recommended Posts

Have a commercial shoot coming up next week that involves shooting a game of chess. Director wants the chess set to appear as if its in a large room and the board and pieces are 2-3ft tall. I've done quite a bit of research regarding DOF being very important when shooting scaled objects.

 

Does anyone have any advice/ tips as to what I can do differently, avoid, ect???

 

My Plan:

 

They are building a custom chess set/board that will be slightly larger than a normal set. The set will be on a table top that is the exact dimension as the board.

-I suggested to build 3 wall flats that will sit about 5-6ft back from the chess table (the walls will be movable so we can adjust accordingly) The walls will be 4ft wide and 6ft tall.

-I will be lighting mostly from overhead with a few sources from the sides.

-there will be a slight haze over set.

 

-a hand model will be moving the pieces as we go through the scenes. the shots will be a mix of closeups, slo mo, overhead, sweeps.

 

 

I will be shooting on a RED EPIC. I thought it best to have the camera on a Chapman Dolly the entire day to save time of setups.

 

My Questions:

 

-What is the best way to approach lens choices for shooting miniatures?

-How much light do we really need if I plan on shooting at say an f16 (Is there correct math for choosing the best aperture when shooting miniatures to get the correct DOF?)

-Will the walls act as a proper background for this project, making it feel as if we are in a giant room?

-Will the chess pieces look bigger than average?

 

Looking forward to hearing your advice and answers.

 

M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Traditionally you'd want as small an aperture as possible.

 

However, these days one sees a lot of photography where normal sized scenes are given very short depth of field.

 

The potential problem you'll have is that a chessboard will be understood, by default, as small. With a minature building, on the other hand, it is by default, understood as large, so the only problem you'd have shooting a miniature building is ensuring some consitency with what photography of a normal building might look like.

 

But what would photography of a chessboard normally look like? Normally it will look like the chessboard is small. So you'd need something other just DOF to suggest it is large. Is the hand going to be large as well? What is left to suggest in any way the chessboard is oversize? Or even meant to be oversized? Especially when it isn't.

 

You need something else in the scene to suggest the chessboard is oversized - or reciprically, that whatever else is in the scene has shrunk.

 

C

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

You'd want to stop down as much as possible, f/16, f/22, etc. The other thing is to get the camera into a position that doesn't seem high in the air if these chess pieces are supposed to be huge. This can mean using things like Innovision probe lenses and snorkels to get the lens down to the table top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Years ago I was reading a forum where shooting miniatures, space ships I believe, was being discussed and the one thing I remember from that was in regard to camera pans.

The idea was that if you didn't adjust the pivot point correctly the effect would be that the camera would seem to be out at the end of a long crane rather than in a stationary point.

I think the pivot point needed to be at the front element of the lens , but a little experimenting would probably get it right.

I'm not sure if I'm being particularly clear on the concept.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Years ago I was reading a forum where shooting miniatures, space ships I believe, was being discussed and the one thing I remember from that was in regard to camera pans.

The idea was that if you didn't adjust the pivot point correctly the effect would be that the camera would seem to be out at the end of a long crane rather than in a stationary point.

I think the pivot point needed to be at the front element of the lens , but a little experimenting would probably get it right.

I'm not sure if I'm being particularly clear on the concept.

sounds like they scaled the parallax according to the scale the miniatures are

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...