Jump to content

Digital Super 8 Cartridge


Patrick Steemers

Recommended Posts

Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't someone already try this? I vaguely remember a nofilmschool article and even a failed kickstarter attempt. Kudos on getting a working prototype though.

 

May be they think it's cool/ and Hip , to carry around there grandfather's camera . then call it film making .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Glenn Brady

I think the device might be useful for rehearsing shots. It may not be as handy as a video assist, but very few Super 8 cameras have that (Beaulieu had a prototype or very limited production run many years ago and there are a variety of home-made assists).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There have been so many ideas around this concept.

Some as a study in design others as a serious thought.

 

At Euro 1000 per piece this not going to happen.

 

As the idea now seems to be that the S8 camera must run with the cartridge door open for the wires to connect to the contacts one might just as well attempt to create an adapter which will allow a smartphone camera to film the image of the Super-8 camera.

It needs a groundglass to project the image on or possibly a block of fibreoptics. Possibly with a 45 degree positioned surface-mirror Then likely the camera will need a close-up lens to focus on the projected image. And of course there must be a holder for the smartphone. The camera needs to film when the camera is running and it needs sync pulses from the camera to find the frames of interest. A software package needs to be developed. Any takers :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Andries, great thoughts tx! Linking the cartridge with the external module is foreseen by adapting the viewing glass used for seeing the type of film. Most cameras have this on the standard location. By taking out the piece of plastic you created a hole through which the connection is possible via mini USB.

 

By placing the sendor at the focal plane the best image quality is achieved. Like your idea about using a smart phone but it will be hard to synchronise trigger it's camera. The expensive part of the prototype is the small size camera and sensor which are however perfect given the limitations of the super 8 dimensions.

 

Once an improved prototype is ready we might try a kickstart initiative to get funding and first orders to drive scale and drive down cost. Also may use cheaper electronics such as Beaglebone Black.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The focal plane is very thin. It will be very difficult and likely impossible to extend the bare sensor out so much from the pressure plate of your new cartridge that it can be in the focal plane and still be connected to the electronics. You might want to study things a bit by studying the parts of a disassembled cartridge a bit. Glue a piece of film to the pressure plate. Hold the plate against the camera gate and then think things through how to get your digital camera and its sensor at that place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is indeed one of the challenges. Solution for now is to adapt the S8 camera by simply removing the film gate which usually has 2 simple screws. It's a compromise but if one wants to pimp one's camera and be able to film hours of digital super 8 it's a simple intervention that can also be reversed.

This solution has proven to work so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth...the reason an Aaton 16mm digital magazine was never developed was because the Aaton mag 'throat' is too narrow to accomodate an 'off the shelf' chip.

A special chip would have to be developed to fit ...all chips are made mounted to circuit boards and its this extra width that limits mounting options...I think things have moved on now and nobody would be willing to re-develop such a chip due to the massive costs involved.

Not sure if that helps you...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For what it's worth...the reason an Aaton 16mm digital magazine was never developed was because the Aaton mag 'throat' is too narrow to accomodate an 'off the shelf' chip.

A special chip would have to be developed to fit ...all chips are made mounted to circuit boards and its this extra width that limits mounting options...I think things have moved on now and nobody would be willing to re-develop such a chip due to the massive costs involved.

Not sure if that helps you...

I never knew that about the Aaton system. I wonder how P+S Technik made the SR digital mag? Maybe it's because it doesn't have a slide-in magazine throat and they had more room? I wish that thing could be updated. I would love a spinning-mirror "16mm" digital camera.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Development of the Digital Super 8 Cartridge. Using a subminiature 15 x 15mm USB camera board, 3D printed Super 8 cartridge and an Intel based Dev Board. Bring your old S8 camera back to life by a digital hack.

Comments welcome!

 

http://www.ximea.com/community/f4/digital-super-8-cartridge-8mm-film-cameras-96/

Well if you shoot film you are using the camera for what it's made for . that means it's alive and well ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thus the camera is wrecked for the purpose of putting the Euro 1000 adapter in? Or are people supposed to unmount and mount the gate assembly from the camera?

 

Don't forget about the end-film-feeler and the claw going up and down.

 

And how are you going to adjust for different camera designs? The gates aren't the same on different models and brands.

 

How are you going to put a grain sensation in the prime recording. Postprocessing is not authentic enough. People could then just as well shoot using a Euro 400 DSLR and crop 3:4 with some postprocess grainy look.

Edited by Andries Molenaar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Patrick,

 

I see on the forum you mention that the resolution is VGA (640x480) and that the frame rate is 18fps.

 

Excuse me for stating the obvious but why would people want to record such a low frame rate and resolution?

You do not get Super-8 look just because you shot through a shutter and a lens, it comes from the film itself.

Also when talking digital any video camera or photo camera can today shoot video in much higher resolution also with same lens mounts or through adapters the only thing missing is the shutter but that's not needed for this purpose to be frank.

 

Believe me when I say that I applaud your efforts however I think you'll find a bigger market in making a video assist system for existing Super-8 cameras than trying to replace the film it-self because people has a Super-8 camera for a reason and in 99% of all cases the reason is not that it's just collecting dust in a corner but rather being used.

 

Best regards

Lasse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Speaking of which, what ever happened with the Digital Bolex?...

 

 

You can buy one! They even came out with a monochrome only model. They are a niche, of course, and 'project' cameras in and of themselves, but they appear to be operating normally. Their lens line is forthcoming too, but nearly finalized as far as I can tell.

 

http://www.digitalbolex.com/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

 

 

You can buy one! They even came out with a monochrome only model. They are a niche, of course, and 'project' cameras in and of themselves, but they appear to be operating normally. Their lens line is forthcoming too, but nearly finalized as far as I can tell.

 

http://www.digitalbolex.com/

 

Thanks...not interested in buying one. Just never heard anything about it after its rather lack-luster pre-launch which kind of answered my question to begin with, I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've heard, they work pretty well. They were announced at a time when there seemed to be a glut of cine cameras aside from the Red, but it took a long time to get into production, and now it feels like there's a new camera out every week.

Edited by Josh Gladstone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

On the Digital Bolex, I think the Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera kinda took the wind out of it's sails.

 

The Digital Bolex is just a strange bird, has some pro features but not quite; kinda like a film Bolex. A film Bolex is like the best consumer 16mm camera you'd get. Costs more than the K-100's of the world but not quite up to an Arri SR.

 

The Blackmagic Pocket Cinema camera has a similar image quality/style and costs 1/3rd. Digital Bolex has a nice ergonomic if you're going handheld but bad view screen. Just strange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...