Dominik Bauch Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 I have an option to round out a rental set of Cooke anamorphic i primes (32, 40, 50, 75, 100, 180) with either a 65mm macro or 135mm. To me the 65mm isn't really a big magnification and as I have a 50mm and 75mm in the set, I can just add a diopter and get similar results (albeit with some chromatic aberration around the edges but that can be nice at times and take the digital edge off.) I get that I can't focus to infinity but the weight penalty of this large lens leads me to be happier with adding diopters to regular primes. Am I missing something here as others have talked about the 65mm being special....? I'm leaning towards the 135mm as that's a built in close up lens, 100mm not quite there without a diopter and 180 is a little too tight. Looking for advice from anyone who has used these lenses a lot. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ Young Posted October 6, 2020 Share Posted October 6, 2020 I've shot a lot with Cooke anamorphics; to be honest I rarely went past a 75mm. I vote for the 65mm Macro! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now