Jacob Mitchell Posted July 31, 2021 Share Posted July 31, 2021 Hi all, Can't remember from where, but I've heard of the ability to shoot on print stock just as one would on regular motion picture stock, with the idea of having a very punchy and contrasty look. Does anyone have experience with this? Looking at the Kodak catalog, it seems print stock primarily comes in 2,000' rolls, which would make the process of downspooling a bit tedious... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted July 31, 2021 Premium Member Share Posted July 31, 2021 I maybe dumb here, but print stock gives you an inverse image, it's not "reversal". If you shoot on it, you will get a negative image when processed and a pretty poor one at that. You can however, shoot on intermediate stock, which will give you a negative and then you can make a print from that. However, intermediate stock is very low ISO like 5 or so, I think? Not exactly ideal, your actors would probably be sweating before you got the camera rolling. There are other issues with shooting intermediate stock as well; it doesn't use the same perf type, so quite a few cameras that are designed to fill the perf, will not fill the perf and probably damage the perf. Some cameras don't care like the Aaton's and older Arri's like the 2C. But any modern camera, will care for sure. In the end, nobody really shoots on anything else but camera film. That's what it was made for and that's what people use for a reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member David Sekanina Posted July 31, 2021 Premium Member Share Posted July 31, 2021 (edited) I thought you shouldn't run print stock through your camera, as it has an polyester base which is much harder to tear than the acetate base of negative stock. Should a problem occur while the film runs through the camera, it would not tear and might damage the movement. Edited July 31, 2021 by David Sekanina Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted July 31, 2021 Premium Member Share Posted July 31, 2021 2 hours ago, David Sekanina said: I thought you shouldn't run print stock through your camera, as it has an polyester base which is much harder to tear than the acetate base of negative stock. Should a problem occur while the film runs through the camera, it would not tear and might damage the movement. Yea that too, but most cameras won't jam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Sponsor Robert Houllahan Posted July 31, 2021 Site Sponsor Share Posted July 31, 2021 We see people shooting print stock for the look and cost, it has a unique look and color. I would suggest running it in a Filmo or a similar robust camera in case of a jam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karim D. Ghantous Posted August 1, 2021 Share Posted August 1, 2021 This quick summary might be helpful: https://walkens.com.au/product/mfs-vision-2383-35mm-cine-print-film/ Key points: - Made for development in ECP-2D but can be cross processed in C-41 - Heavy blue bast shot unfiltered, use orange filter for more natural color - clear base film, no remjet to remove Now you have me interested in shooting stills with it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacob Mitchell Posted August 3, 2021 Author Share Posted August 3, 2021 Thank you everyone for the pointers! I would be curious to have everyone's thoughts on this, shot on 35mm Ektachrome Print stock! Also, Karim, that print 35mm looks incredible, I'll have to buy some. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted August 4, 2021 Premium Member Share Posted August 4, 2021 5 hours ago, Jacob Mitchell said: Thank you everyone for the pointers! I would be curious to have everyone's thoughts on this, shot on 35mm Ektachrome Print stock! Also, Karim, that print 35mm looks incredible, I'll have to buy some. That looks like modern Ektachrome color camera stock, there is no way they had enough light to shoot with print stock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Aapo Lettinen Posted August 4, 2021 Premium Member Share Posted August 4, 2021 print stock has KS perfs and long pitch when the normal camera negative has BH perfs and short pitch. If your camera has register pins it may damage the camera a lot if trying to run this type of stock through it, especially if it's polyester base stuff (the reg pins not landing on the perf holes and the holes being of wrong shape so that the pins can't actually fit into the perf holes without tearing the film and damaging the pins. may cause so much resistance that you can't even run the camera at all for the motor not being powerful enough) I am regularly shooting sound negative and stills b/w stocks on Konvas cameras and they work fine with them. A camera like this which has a simple pulldown and enough tolerances can handle multiple types of stocks and the wrong pitch does not matter that much either because the camera can compensate for it a little. I am sure that cameras like Arri2c and Cameflex can handle KS long pitch just as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Aapo Lettinen Posted August 4, 2021 Premium Member Share Posted August 4, 2021 On 7/31/2021 at 10:43 AM, Tyler Purcell said: Yea that too, but most cameras won't jam. if it has register pins it will definitely jam unless one is specifically modifying the camera to tolerate both the wrong perforation shape AND the too long pitch between perforations. They are both a serious problem. There is, though, the possibility to use a Soviet 35mm camera like Kinor35N in its original state because Soviets actually used the KS perf and long pitch negative film in their cameras and the Kinors were originally built for "print stock" specifications Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted August 4, 2021 Premium Member Share Posted August 4, 2021 (edited) 2 minutes ago, aapo lettinen said: if it has register pins it will definitely jam unless one is specifically modifying the camera to tolerate both the wrong perforation shape AND the too long pitch between perforations. They are both a serious problem. There is, though, the possibility to use a Soviet 35mm camera like Kinor35N in its original state because Soviets actually used the KS perf and long pitch negative film in their cameras and the Kinors were originally built for "print stock" specifications If you read my post above, the comment you quoted was related to that information: "There are other issues with shooting intermediate stock as well; it doesn't use the same perf type, so quite a few cameras that are designed to fill the perf, will not fill the perf and probably damage the perf. Some cameras don't care like the Aaton's and older Arri's like the 2C. But any modern camera, will care for sure. " So yes, you have to use a single pulldown non-registration pin camera that doesn't have a claw that FILLS THE PERF, that's the issue. Some single pulldown cameras DO fill the perf, but others don't like the Aaton's. Edited August 4, 2021 by Tyler Purcell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Aapo Lettinen Posted August 4, 2021 Premium Member Share Posted August 4, 2021 1 minute ago, Tyler Purcell said: If you read my post above, the comment you quoted was related to that information: "There are other issues with shooting intermediate stock as well; it doesn't use the same perf type, so quite a few cameras that are designed to fill the perf, will not fill the perf and probably damage the perf. Some cameras don't care like the Aaton's and older Arri's like the 2C. But any modern camera, will care for sure. " I thought it was still commenting on the print film jamming issue because no one uses polyester based BH negative in movie cameras ( so polyester film jamming = polyester KS long pitch film jamming) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Tyler Purcell Posted August 4, 2021 Premium Member Share Posted August 4, 2021 2 minutes ago, aapo lettinen said: I thought it was still commenting on the print film jamming issue because no one uses polyester based BH negative in movie cameras ( so polyester film jamming = polyester KS long pitch film jamming) Looks like a mistype, since I mentioned jamming as the #1 issue two posts above. IDK, musta been tired. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gautam Valluri Posted September 8, 2021 Share Posted September 8, 2021 On 8/3/2021 at 9:10 PM, Jacob Mitchell said: Thank you everyone for the pointers! I would be curious to have everyone's thoughts on this, shot on 35mm Ektachrome Print stock! Also, Karim, that print 35mm looks incredible, I'll have to buy some. This is excellent stuff Jacob. I'm sorry I didn't understand which Ektachrome print film were you referring to? Did you mean the Ektachrome E100 made for still cameras with KS perforations? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now