Jump to content

NEW ORWO STOCK - TEST RESULTS


Recommended Posts

As of yesterday, both ORWO NC 500 and NC 400 can be bought in motion picture lenghts of 122 M / 305 M and 610 M on the Orwo website. The 35mm film is BH 1866 perforated and does not have a Remjet backing. The price is very competitive. 

Here are a few takeaways from my test with the material. This will concern the NC 500 emulsion. The NC 400 emulsion will be discussed in another post at a later date. 
The tests were conducted with material cut down from long rolls with BH 1866 perforation, not with 135-36 finished material. 


I've been fortunate enough to have been able to (technically) test a few stages of the emulsion over the last months and must say, that they have come a long way. Making a color film from scratch is not an easy task - some would have called it impossible. Yet, Orwo and the engineers and emulsioneers at Innoviscoat managed to come up with a new color emulsion - in record time. I suggest to take a moment to appreciate this.

Many here and elsewhere have been very sceptical and sometimes even demeaning. If you have a problem with the brand, or those associated with it, please refrain from commenting - marketing and distribution of the product is not subject of my short review here. I want to talk about the emulsion. 

Film Speed: 

Even though the Film is called NC 500, the sensitometrically determined film speed of the emulsion, processed in a monitored ECN-2 process is close to 320. Under practical conditions, I suggest the film be exposed at E.I. 250. 

Granularity: 

Compared to 5219 and 5207, Orwo NC500 is noticeably grainier. This, however, isn't necessarily a bug, but more a feature. The film is not a Vision3 emulsion, and does not even come close. But it does not have to, in my opinion. Compared to any available modern emulsion, the NC 500 has a distinct grain structure / dye distribution pattern that resembles early chromogenic emulsions. Some will like the look, others will not. That's a matter of personal taste. 

Sharpness: 

Sharpness and especially acutance could be improved upon, but again, in this regard as well the film is distinctly not a Vision3 film. 

Antihalation:

Since the film has no remjet backing, one might assume halations could be an issue. However, I am pleased to say that the integral anti halation layer present in the emulsion works very well in surpressing both reflection and diffusion halations. 

Color Reproduction:

Color Saturation is overall on the lower end of the spectrum. Especially the yellow dye forming layer fails to form sufficient dye density, which results in muted blues, especially apparent in a blue sky. Overall color reproduction is acceptable. 

Uniformity

I still need to conduct a final (moving image) test with the material to give a conclusion here. My tests however, suggest that the film should perform as expected. 

Conclusion

Someone who only shoots on 5203 / 50D will probably not enjoy NC 500. If you like to try a new look that is distinctly not as clean as Vision3, but more in line of color negative films found in the late 1960s and early 1970s, this might be a good way to explore that route.

 

Here are a few example shots taken last weekend in the mountains: 

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rmL7xXPM7YynMUSlYk_sYALSPFZ1Yrt1/view?usp=sharing

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1CeWNT5hlof_1zkLFeEBvHEfPDSA06RPY/view?usp=share_link

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

The color of the base of the film is quite different to other color film stocks. Should scanning facilities modify their scanning procedure, and plug-in creators create a special profile for ORWO conversion to positive? Or do the current methods work well?

Edited by David Sekanina
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, David Sekanina said:

The color of the base of the film is quite different to other color film stocks. Should scanning facilities modify their scanning procedure, and plug-in creators create a special profile for ORWO conversion to positive? Or do the current methods work well?

that's a very good question. Since the film has no orange mask scanners may have a harder time. But a good operator should be able to handle it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
8 hours ago, David Sekanina said:

The color of the base of the film is quite different to other color film stocks. Should scanning facilities modify their scanning procedure, and plug-in creators create a special profile for ORWO conversion to positive? Or do the current methods work well?

It's gonna be exciting to figure out how to scan it, that's part of the process in my view. 

We'll be doing a video all about it once we receive our test rolls. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Sponsor
14 hours ago, David Sekanina said:

The color of the base of the film is quite different to other color film stocks. Should scanning facilities modify their scanning procedure, and plug-in creators create a special profile for ORWO conversion to positive? Or do the current methods work well?

Modern scanners like the Arriscan or Scan Station etc. do a "base calibration" where the individual RGB lamp channels are swept through a range of intensity to find color balance and lamp output relative to the clear base. This works fine for stuff like Ektachrome that has been cross-processed and does not have the orange mask. So not really an issue with this stock I would think.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Sponsor
2 hours ago, David Sekanina said:

Thank you Robert. I knew the Arriscan does it from what I've seen at Cinegrell, but wasn't sure about the other scanners.

I think the Arriscan was the first to employ this technique, basically each color is ramped until the sensor clips and then the intensity is backed off. This maximized the DR of the sensor for each color to the sensor. In CFA scanners a similar set of pulses are done but then full RGB illumination because there is allot of color channel cross talk on a color sensor.

Fairly simple and a fast way to match the lamp to the sensor / film stock for most dynamic range and color balance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
1 minute ago, Robert Houllahan said:

I thought this stock was based on the Agfa 320T color negative.

I have a feeling it is. I'm gonna test with and without an 85 filter. Some peeps said its very blue/green, so that would tell me it needs an 85. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Joerg Polzfusz said:

When the film is unmasked, could you simply soup it in E6 and use it as color reversal?

No - maskless does not mean it has a clear base. It has a dye filter layer instead of a mask. A coupler mask essentially builds density where no image information is and has no density where image information is. Contrary to that, a filter layer simply adds a dye filter to the film that sort of acts as a mask. 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, with these high prices, Orwo will price itself out of the competition. Especially for  longer form productions, it will be Kodak. Kodak has consistentcy and a track record as opposed to these grossly high priced products... shame..

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
8 minutes ago, Piotr Wołoszyk said:

I must be definitely missing something: why should I bother about this ORWO stock, when I can get Kodak 400ft roll 100€ cheaper (tax included)?

@Uli Meyer I see it's 374,54 !

It shows me the price in Pound Sterling. 
Let’s hope that there’s a glitch on the website. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...