Larry Miles

Hello, I'm interested in purchasing an Arri 2C medical camera body. Can be a 'For Parts' sale, as long as the advance knob is functional. Please reply with price request. Thank you.

Can the Norris Intervalometer be used to make an MOS camera (the Arri III) shoot sync? Thank you.

Thank you.

Hello, does anyone know if there's any operational difference (light loss, image coverage) between using a lens with a Cameflex mount on a Cameflex mount camera vs. using the same lens on a PL mount with an adapter? Or is that too general a question and it would depend on the lens? Thank you.

I would have to go back and check to confirm (and I may do so in the near future), but I believe I gathered it from one of the commentary tracks included with the special edition (Blu-ray) that they put out (it includes the memo of revisions Orson Welles wrote upon which Walter Murch based his changes), where the commentator went over the differences between the different versions of the film.

I would guess a Baltar, but I'm not sure which focal length.

David, thank you as always. My understanding is that the rear projection shots were forced by the studio into the film and against Welles' wishes. Do you happen to know, or are you willing to guess, as to which lens they used for Dietrich's close-ups?

Famously, Touch of Evil was shot almost entirely on one lens, the Angenieux 18.5. Does anyone know which specific shots didn't use that lens and, perhaps, which lens they did use? Thank you.

Thank you for your input. I assumed Lomos, just because they’re Russian; I have no personal experience with them. In my limited experience with Zeiss, I find their perspective to be a bit more distorted than other lenses.

Thank you for the link. I will be sure to check it out.

Last night I watched for the first time Come and See on Criterion's Blu-ray. A mind-blowing film, sometimes difficult to watch, and that, for me, reinforces the cultural need for the shared experience of watching movies in a theater. Does anyone know which lenses were used? Thank you.

I saw Pier Pasolini's "Teorema" (1968, D.P. Giuseppe Ruzzolini) for the first time last night and i thought it had a beautiful look. Does anyone know which lenses were used? According to imdb, the cameras were Arriflex. Thank you.

Dom, thank you so much.

The subject pretty much says it all. I'm thinking of converting my Aaton mount camera to PL, but I would hate to lose the use of my Aaton-mount lenses. Thank you.

I was told by Steve at Du-All here in New York that the 'AR' stands for anti-reflective coating. Specifically to Davo: I in no way claim to be anything close to an expert on this but my understanding is that a lens in an Arri Bayonet lens mount will not fit into an Arri Standard camera mount, precisely because of those wings, which are usually machined as part of the lens housing. I believe you would need an Arri Standard to Arri Bayonet lens adapter, which may not exist, since except for those wings, these mounts are the same, including the same depth. Unfortunately, you may need to either re-house the lens into an Arri standard mount, or find a different mount extender with the appropriate adapters, which is how I solved the problem. In other words, my lens is in Arri standard, my extender is in an Eclair mount, and my camera is an Aaton with an Aaton mount. Thus I purchased an Arri to Eclair adapter to fit the lens into the extender, and an Eclair to Aaton adapter to fit the the extender (with the lens and its adapter) into the camera. I have yet to test this set up for light loss.

Or did you mean that this doesn't itself attach to the camera but the mount that is removed from the Angenieux lens is then reattached to the telezoom's other side?

Thank you, but into which camera mount will this tele-extender fit?

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.

The O-L refers to Open/Lock. The front piece, the one on top of the telezoom in the fifth picture that prevented an Arri Standard mount lens from being fitted into it, is removable. Once removed, my Angenieux 17.5-70 with an Arri Standard mount fit, however the O/L lock did not keep it in place. The removable front piece has a tab that fits into a slot in the telezoom which allows it to be locked. Perhaps the Angenieux AR 25-250 has the same tab? Also, although it fit, the 17.5-70 is not in focus when used with the telezoom. I have yet to experiment with sliding it so that it's not fully pushed in, but I'm doubtful that will work.

Thank you, Dom. Attached are the photos.

Does it simply mean Arri? I believe the AR designation on Kern lenses refers to the coating. Does anyone know if an Angenieux 12-240 Arri std mount will fit into the telezoom? If you believe it will, do you know why my Angenieux 17.5-70 Arri std mount does not?

Thank you, both. I ordered some Wiha precision screwdrivers.

Thank you, David, I hadn't considered that. The specific reason why I'm asking is that I recently purchased a Birns and Sawyer Angenieux AR 2x telezoom with an Arri standard mount. It in fact does fit into an Arri standard adapter but my Angenieux 17.5-70mm lens, with an Arri std mount, does not fit into its other side.

I apologize if this has been covered previously but if it has I could not find the thread. What does the "AR" of Angenieux AR lenses refer to, and which Angenieux lenses are AR? Specifically, is the Angenieux 12-240 an AR lens? Thank you.

I've recently purchased an Arri Standard/Bayo-lens-mount to Aaton-camera-mount adapter. I believe that to use it with an Arri Standard lens the adapter's three screws need to be tightened into the lens's mount. Could someone please recommend a specific screwdriver to use to do this? Thank you.