Jan Weis

less than 24 hours left! http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...em=150357339150

Hi, I have this wide angle 10mm c-mount lens up for bidding which is perfect for a Bolex or a Beaulieu R16 etc. Its great in really tight locations or if you want to capture a lot of scenery. Take a look if youre interested! http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...em=150357475949

Hi just wanted to tell you all that auction is nearing its end, 2 days left. So please bid if youre interested, this is a great and sharp lens and perfect for low light sequences! http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...em=150357339150

Hi I have this excellent Angenieux 25mm f/0.95 C-Mount lens for sale or rather up for bidding on ebay. I'm selling it since I am abandoning 16mm filming all together, ive sold my cameras so now its this lens that I have to sell. Check it out at http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewI...em=150357339150

I'm short of words just the words "Good night, and good luck" come in mind my condolences to the family. /Jan

Thank you both for your insights. The reason I asked was because I remember reading somewhere in the red department of this messageboard, that since DI was introduced (with 2k resolution) people in this industry have had their standards lowered in terms of quality/resolution of movies on the big screen. So I'm starting to wondering if Kodak & Fuji will start promoting 4k scans in the future, now that HD is becoming used more frequently in studio pictures...Only speculation, but does anybody have a theory they would like to share concerning this matter? /Jan

Ok if we look back to the days before DI, when the classic contact print process was used, what kind of resolution were the prints at? most films that go through DI are scanned at 2k?Correct? and the prints contain aproximately 1.5-2k resolution? So I'd imagine that the contact prints reached around 3-4k, Is this assumption correct? Hope I can get this cleared out thanks /Jan

I think youre confusing the word "pushing" with "rating". When they say the filmstock is often ''pushed'' what they mean is that its chemically pushed (processed for a longer time). When you rate this stock at 800 and because of (for example) a low light situation, then to get more detail out of the film, you ask the lab to ''push'' it to get that detail. I hope I helped in someway...but you experts please feel free to correct me or better yet explain the process better. /Jan

We're all playing it, so yes I think he did.

However he was a better chess player than most of us.

Well for b&w film, colored filters can really change the look. A red filter for example turns the sky into dark grey (as aposed to the white sky). /Jan

I'm sure that its not only the cost of the film that stopped it from being shot entirely on 65mm, wouldnt the crew have to be larger? Also dont forget that itll probably take more time to shoot it on 65mm. /Jan

You might want to check this link out http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/...ablocator.jhtml choose Denmark and voila! P.S. When I ordered film from fuji neatherlands earlier this year, One of the sales person hand delivered it to me since he was on his way to Sweden anyways. It was he who told me that almost all handlugage x-ray machines are safe, in fact the films he delivered went through handlugage x-ray machine as well. The films turned out fine. I wish you best of luck on your film! /Jan

Some parts of Spider-man 3 were also shot on 65mm. It seems as though advance special effects might need high resolution in order to look as good as they do...Thats my own little theory. Or maybe the directors & DoP just feel like experimenting with IMAX? What do I know...

As far as I know, it is completly safe to travel with film if you take it with you as handlugage. The deadly x-rays machines are used to scan the regular lugage, the stuff you check in. Hope it helps ! /Jan

Think the S stands for sound, not sync. No the camera is not crystal sync, 99% positive on that.

SOLD

Does $350 sound like a good price?

You mean God bless photochemics ;)

I've got a Beaulieu R16 for sale. Its regular 16mm and is in excellent working condition together with a clean and scratch free lens with the camera (25-100mm) made Som Berthiot Paris. I have personally made a small modification on the camera that allows the camera to connect to any 7.2V battery. I've owned this camera for about a year and I have used it many times, therefore I can promiss its in working condition. Make me an offer!

it was recorded long before the stock was discontinued.

Please, please, please post a picture. Not only will it increase your chance of a sale, but you'll also satisfy me. /Jan

I do not think reversal is a problem for transfering, in fact it might even be easier to transfer. Im pretty sure all places scan reversal, so that shouldnt be a problem. However, as you might already know, its easier to fix a poorly exposed negative film than reversal. Negative my nature has simply more latitude. With reversal, its basically what you see is what you get, a negative image can be manipulated more. Reversal film can also be ''prepared'' for telecine through various techniques such as ultra sound or ''wetgate'', so I wouldnt worry. The reason that people are more careful with negatives is because theyre more volounarably, theyre more easily scratched. Also dirt is always a problem, and since negative films are inverted dust is more visable and distracting. This is because dust is white when the image is inverted, and its a lot more visable than black dust you see on reversal. /Jan

I second, or triple that. Both Fuji and Kodak have been very generous with giving free film for my filmaking. Always say youre a poor student, and be very kind and thankful. Thatll do the trick. /Jan

Its the registration pin, it provides a stable image.