Andrew G.

I just got an XL2, and I'm looking for good information and guides to help give me a more expert understanding of all of its advanced features. Are there any source online that can help me understand exactly what each setting will do to the picture, both in tech terms and in actual effect (what the visual changes on the picture will be)? I understand some of them, but others I don't get as well.

Abe, I've been in the same pickle as you are. I was stuck between the exact same cameras. I'll share with you my findings. First of all, I've heard a lot of recommendations of the z1u over the FX1 because of its pro features. One big factor the decided it for me was that the XL2 has a better capacity for a cine-like feel, while the Sony is great for documentarian style work with it's great color. However, I hear that XL2 captures motion better than the Sony. The Canon has the ability to change lenses, which is great if you want to do more with your work visually. The HD will supposedly transfer to film a lot better if you are wanting to blow it up for a big screen, like for festivals, etc. FINALLY, I'll share with you my conclusion. I have decided to go with the Canon. I want a good all-around camera, and I'll be making more story-based films than documentarian or videographer work, so a better capacity for good-looking moving shots is more valuable to me. Though I lament the loss of HD, I am comforted by 28 Days Later, a film shot with the XL series. Also, I'm going to be working on a project for the Discovery Channel with some friends, who are shooting on an XL1, and what they've made so far looks great. Lastly, I've always treasured content over superficial quality. I think a film can be great without it being the best visual quality, period, you know? It's really all in what you personally want. I don't think you can go wrong with either of these. But, what do I know, I'm only a student and a cinematography.com newb. I hope I've been of help! You should also look into the DVX100 by Panasonic. It's shaped more like the Sony, and it is optimized for 4:3 ratio, while the Canon is geared toward 16:9. I hope I've been of help to you!

Thanks for all the help! I think, however, that the XL2 is right for me. It seems to have the best features for what I want. Are there any final statements that I might consider (serious hinderances I should consider)?

I really want the best film look I can get. I don't like the whole "soap opera" appearance from regular DV cameras. I'm most interested in having great versatility in how I can manipulate the picture, which is why I'm leaning toward the XL2, which is much more versitile with lenses, etc. I guess my biggest question is whether or not I will, as a student, be at any disadvantage for not having HDV. Thoughts?

I'm a new film student, and I'm just about to purchase a camera. Months of research has left me desperately at a tough decision: which camera will work for me? I've narrowed the selection to the Canon XL2 and the Sony HVR-Z1U. I know this is a popular subject, and support is strong on both sides, but I really want to know what is right FOR ME! What I want is a versitile camera that will last through college, film school, and into a professional career (the beginning of one, anyway). I guess my biggest concern is whether or not I'll be at a disadvantage by not having the HDV. Please tell me, for a student who is still trying to find exactly where he wants to go in film, and needs a camera that'll get him there, which is the wiser option?