:unsure:
I am aspiring to direct a film and I am just doing my home work on "the suppose to be look of my film". Obviously I am going to get a very tight budget. The story is about two entirely different people. I know I am going to get lights and utensils that are years older and will be forced to work with hand me down film stocks. Here arises my problem.
I have decided and will convince the producer to use Kodak Vision 200T and Kodak Vision 500T, I have read a lot about their features and reviews. I did make up my mind after watching "Casino Royale (2006)". Phil Méheux, BSC has used them saying he has much more experience in Vision 500T than Vision2 500T. They shot the film in Super 35mm and then did a DI. I intend to do Super 35mm with 3 perf and do a DI. I know I need to make use of the available or natural lights to optimum.
It is just this Can the film be shot normally like any other low budget film and the richness in color and contrasr can be added later in the DI process without doing any changes while the shooting process. To do so I would also like to know how to plan my film according to the less fancy lights. There are not going to be any grandeur action sequences except a few hand to hand combats and the story pretty much happens in the city. Are my stock selections OK? Please I would be glad to hear some advice ...
B)