Hi folks,
I am grappling with a decision. I have been using a Canon Scoopic 16M and like it very much. Now I have an important decision to make regarding format before embarking on a doc project. The scenarios are these.
1. Shooting 16mm in 1.33:1 (4:3) and editing as 4:3 because most of the archival footage I have is already 4:3 Beta and mini-DV.
2. Shoot 16mm and during telecine scan the 16mm Scoopic footage to 1080P pillarboxed in ProRes 422 to a hard drive. This will be then down scaled by putting it into a FCP 720P timeline. The archival 4:3 video footage will then be edited into this, essentially scaled up to 720P. Output final doc as 720P pillarboxed footage. (In this scenario, would it be fine to go 1080P or 720P pillarboxed? The archival footage will look rough but it fits the doc subject, which is war.)
3. Shoot 16mm with slow film and compose for widescreen, telecine to 1080P, drop into FCP and scale to 1080 or 720 full frame (non-pillarboxed), do same with 4:3 archival footage, even though it will look rough.
4. Acquire a Bolex S16mm and go straight to 1080P telecine, edit as 1080P. Next, pillarbox or scale the 4:3 archival footage to 1080P in FCP.
I intend for this to go out to DVD or project digitally, not for film transfer to 35mm.
Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Roger