Jump to content

Kevin Laurent

Basic Member
  • Posts

    6
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Kevin Laurent

  • Birthday 10/27/1985

Profile Information

  • Occupation
    Cinematographer
  • Location
    Paris, France

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    http://www.kevin-laurent.com/
  1. That's what I think too, but I thought it would be visible as compression artifact, not as noise... We shot in 422 due to editing computer that wasn't powerful enough. Thanks for the answer.
  2. We used Prores422 - 25fps, so according to Arri Specs, it should be something like 122Mbit/s. Do you think this bitrate could cause noise?
  3. Hi Oliver, Thanks for the answer. We used DaVinci Resolve for colorgrading, with its 'Alexa LogC to Rec709' LUT convertion. I will look at this tool for LUTs, but the problem is not here. In fact, I already have noise on the LogC footage. So I wonder if it would have been better to record Prores4444 or 422HQ (I'm talking only about noise). Unfortunately, the film was shot in just one day, so I didn't have time to do all my measures. I will talk to my colorist about it and see if I can get some more info about the low lights of my scenes... I was also wondering if it's better to shot at 400ASA or even 200 in low-light scenes. I know that the latitude is better, but what about the noise? Thank you! Kevin
  4. Hello guys! I'm not used to post here, but I've an issue with some footage shot on Alexa. I was DoP on a short film a few weeks ago, shot on Alexa, and a great part of the rushes are noisy. It's not like video noise, but it's too much for me. I know that the Alexa is supposed to have a very low level of noise, so I'm wondering if I did something wrong on set. Due to post-production computers, we shot on SxS cards, Prores422 (not HQ). We shot in LogC, 800ASA. So my questions are: Is the format Prores422 responsible for this noise? Is there any post-production "denoising step" I should be aware of? If you have any question to get some info that could help me, I'm here. Thanks. Kevin
  5. You could not be more clear than that... I got it ! Thanks Tony ! So as I understand it, if you take any Arricam Mag, it's 9P magazine, right ?
  6. Hey guys, I'm sorry, but I couldn't understand what you're talking about when you're saying 9 6 or 9 9. Reading Tony, I guess there's something with perforations... Can someone enlighten me about it ? Thanks !
×
×
  • Create New...