Well, I am not here to debate film v/s digital. Though I can comfortably work on digital, my personal preference is Film. I just bought an Arri SR3 HS camera package from Munich and I am shooting. I like the fact that S16 is an affordable format. I can shoot experimental things. I wish I can buy a 2K digital camera but scared of investing loads of money because they get outdated in 2 years. advanced sony cine cameras costing upwards of 200,000USD were, in a year, selling for less than 10K - the same fate as of Arri 435s being sold cheap on internet.
Digital/electronic repairs are expensive. Analog cameras are repaired easily.
With digital there is one thing for sure - there is going to be no steadiness/constants in terms of product, softwares, codecs, & pricing. Every 3-4 years some new digital camera manufacturer will come in the market backed by quick return seeking venture capitalist and the product will suddenly lose charm because the funds for further R&D have dried up. The investors recoup their profit, and pump it in Taiwan because someone there has found a new sensor that can see as good as an eye. So, digital cinema is more like an iPhone culture these days.
Whether you make films on digital or films, you as filmmaker is going to suffer. You need to have some clairvoyance to see the future. Of course digital will rule the roost but at what cost? The only beneficiaries are the investors who invest in these 'fast food' technology without any binding commitment to stay put behind a product. As an exercise you can count how many cameras came and vanished since the digital revolution began. you will be surprised. :-)
Democratisation and capitalisation of Arts isn't beneficial to us filmmakers in any ways. think about it. think deeply.
regards