Oh, ok! Now I saw what you said.
@0:24 I was running with the kid, handheld camera. We've done 3-4 takes of it and that was the editor's choice, maybe there's one or two takes that I got all him in frame, but I really wanted to go the most close as possible to the actor to get his expression (the same time that we could see the books)
@0:46 It was my choice. Two steps away to get all Jean's head I would be too far (I couldn't shot in low angle by scenery issues), and my priority in this shot was his eyes reacting to the screenplay. You can look @0:48: all his head in the frame, but doesn't look right to me.
@1:00 Again, my choice. At this moment (of the film) this character is like a ghost in the story's context, so I cut him and lit him by silhouette in almost all his scenes at this moment.
@1:02 The ad I told you, reframed by the client/agency.
@1:16 There, yes, an error of movement. The camera should turn (and move some steps back) slowly of the actress face to both characters, all in frame. Again, we've done a few takes (I really don't remember if we got one better), but it was the editor/director's choice looking the acting.
I understand your point and, looking all my stuff, there's a tendency and there's a (personal) thing with actors/actresses' eyes that makes me cut heads with no hesitation. haha maybe some things to fix, much to think about. Thanks Simon!