Thanks Bruce. The look was very important to me. I could never capture the same feeling with digital. For me personally digital gets to the point where it becomes so clean it feels sterile. It's just not the format artistically I want to work with. I choose film.
Set in a movie theater, In Frame follows Paul, a theater employee who weaves his day through different fantasies about his co worker Anna. One of the direct influences on the story would be that of Billy Liar. In the end he has to make a choice. Does he continue living in this fantasy of his or does to take a step into reality and make a move. Being in movie theater is just an extension of the plot. We all go the movies to escape. Paul escapes into his own mind much like we escape into movies. In many ways the film is a love letter to film. I wanted the viewer to know they are watching film. So I purposely left in film artifacts in the cut, over exposed and under exposed key scenes, pushed the grain, used the tail ends of the reels to cut between certain scenes.
Yes I recorded all sound including dialogue in post expect for one scene. The scene takes place in the projector room with the film projector running. So I just recorded it as normal with the camera noise and all. It fit perfectly and I didn't have to touch a thing.
My shooting ratio was 2 to 1 at most. I would say for about 90% it was 1 to 1. I had the actors rehears through the scenes till they got it right. Being the independent film maker, I had to pay for everything out of pocket. So I used mainly recans and some sort ends to keep costs low. I shot the film as a feature length. I ended up with a 80 min cut of the film. But ultimately I felt like it just didn't work as a 80 min film. So I just gutted out the fat and stuck to the core theme of the film. Much like how Woody Allen cut all of the detective plot out of Annie Hall. Of course he had the luxury of not shooting it unlike me. Overall though I ended up with a 22 min cut that I am in love with.
I love the lomo lenses. I wouldn't change a thing. The look it gave me was exactly what I wanted. My favorite is my fast 1.2 28mm. I used it for about 85% of film.
I did a telecine for the film. Edited in final cut pro. I just finished my final cut so I started to enter in all the spring and summer festivals. If I get accepted to at least one I have two options. Either do a negative cut then DI of that or just DI what I need for my cut. The problem with the latter is that I think the cost of having the post production house go through my reels to find the scenes I used would end up being more then just doing a negative cut. If anybody has any suggestions or experience with this type of work flow please let me know. It's the one thing I'm still up in the air about.