-
Posts
194 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Michael Carter
-
Did both, by accident, internegative, 3378
-
Tri-X neg is made to be contact printed onto film. That gets rid of the mush. I have done it onto sound film.
-
Dropbox works fine for large files. I downloaded my 2K scans of 25 feet and even a short 4K sample.
-
How far can Foma be Pushed?
Michael Carter replied to Michael Carter's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
Look for more on my YT channel -
How far can Foma be Pushed?
Michael Carter replied to Michael Carter's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
The video made previous to this one had 25 minuets development. This one was 30 min. I exposed a new film tonight between f2.8 and f4. Anyone have suggestions as to how long I should extend development time for it? I would go at least 5 more minuets but am considering longer just to try and get f4 to work. -
Foma R-100 was push developed in LQR 30 min and the leader is still dark? I can hardly believe it. How far can it go?
-
400ft spool -> 100ft spool
Michael Carter replied to Marco Leoncino's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
I bought new split reels for larger and much larger cores from Urbanskys -
Eastman Double-X 7222 16mm home processing
Michael Carter replied to Marco Leoncino's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
-
Eastman Double-X 7222 16mm home processing
Michael Carter replied to Marco Leoncino's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
It was 16mm developed in a Jobo short tank on a 110 reel. -
Eastman Double-X 7222 16mm home processing
Michael Carter replied to Marco Leoncino's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
A deep red filter was used on 7266 developed in RO9. -
Eastman Double-X 7222 16mm home processing
Michael Carter replied to Marco Leoncino's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
No flicker that I have seen. I have used Rodinal a lot, too. -
Eastman Double-X 7222 16mm home processing
Michael Carter replied to Marco Leoncino's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
That's right, three parts in all. D96 is stronger, I think I have tried it diluted also. There are samples I have done. -
Shooting ESTAR based stock (3383 & 3378)
Michael Carter replied to Derick Crucius's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
It does not work in 50 foot magazines every time, all of the time. Mostly it fails and makes vertically smeared images. However, it does work in other cameras reversed or as negative. My youtube channel has playlists for it. /studiocarter1 -
Eastman Double-X 7222 16mm home processing
Michael Carter replied to Marco Leoncino's topic in Film Stocks & Processing
My latest developments using 7222 were in D-76. Low contrast was wanted. Three tests were made. Here is a link to pictures with descriptions. Today I printed the entire roll onto 3378, another set of chemicals and procedures that took 2 tests. -
Longshot: Kodak K-100 Maintenance Manual
Michael Carter replied to Dennis Toeppen's topic in General Discussion
Good luck getting one. I sow one of these cameras at a show but it ran so loud I almost dropped it. Needless to say I didn't buy it. -
Angenieux-Zoom Type A 12-120
Michael Carter replied to Michael Carter's topic in Lenses & Lens Accessories
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH FOUND IT -
My Bell & Howell 50 foot magazine camera, model 200 S, single lens, and a T, double lens model, are both out of sync between the shutter and the pull down claw needing service. Where can I have that done?
-
Angenieux-Zoom Type A 12-120
Michael Carter replied to Michael Carter's topic in Lenses & Lens Accessories
It is the framing mask that would need to be rotated. If the viewing tube is swiveled the image goes black. I don't know about photos, maybe my cel phone... -
Angenieux-Zoom Type A 12-120
Michael Carter replied to Michael Carter's topic in Lenses & Lens Accessories
How can the image in the 12x120 be rotated horizontally if the viewing tube is on a side and not on top? -
Angenieux-Zoom Type A 12-120
Michael Carter replied to Michael Carter's topic in Lenses & Lens Accessories
Never-mind. I had been using a Bell & Howell Angenieux 17-68 lens that is very similar. However, the larger one will not rotate the frame in the viewer like the smaller. So, clockwise loosened the grooved ring on the large view tube. Then, the smooth part was rotated and locked the swing arm. That is all it does. Disappointing. The lens works if the viewing tube is in line with the lens, that gives a horizontal frame. It cannot be used on a side to give a horizontal image. There ARE some tiny screws on the viewing tube closer to the eyepiece from the grooved ring, but I will not undo them. It works on top of a camera. Good enough.