Jump to content

Paul Mortlock

Basic Member
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Occupation
    Cinematographer
  • Location
    Manchester UK

Recent Profile Visitors

521 profile views
  1. Thanks for the heads up. I'll do some testing anyway with a short end so I can sleep at night ? Thanks! Paul
  2. The Steadicam operator told me the worked on a project where then moved between low and high mode 5 or 6 times on one loaded steadimag. Once developed and scanned they saw scratches on just the inverted footage. I wasn't involved in this job myself, but was interested if anyone else had come across this. Thanks Paul
  3. Thanks Dom Its a clean camera - just serviced by Arri. I will however make these checks you suggested. As you said, i'll shoot some tests too. My worry was that perhaps this was a know potential issue. So i'm glad to learn it's not. Thanks for your input Best, Paul
  4. Hello! and HNY. Inverting the 435 for low mode on Steadicam. Has anyone had more problems with film scratching? I was talking to a Steadicam operator who told me it was more prevalent to get these issues when the camera is inverted. Anyone care to comment one this? Thanks in advance. Paul
  5. The 20mm is a recent conversion so I've described the issue to TLS and returned the lens for evaluation. They mentioned that there are a number of things in the rehousing process that could cause this. I guess the red herring is that it worked perfectly with s35 digital cameras. The camera is S35 - no 2 in the top right of the mount. Thanks all for your input thus far. The knowledge here is fantastic,
  6. Appo - No - Ive not shot a frame on the camera yet Looking through the VF it portholes hard. Much harder than the picture from the video assist I posted in the first post. Thanks Paul
  7. Gavin Whitehust at TLS personally told me all the FD range is good with film cameras. It locks off beautifully in the mount. I'll take it to PV and have it projected. Will report back
  8. No gate matte. As that is after the optics surely that is irrelevant? Please correct me if i'm wrong!
  9. Not using an MB Lenses look just fine on my S35 Amira. Its a TLS rehoused 20mm I have used many many times on digital. I can jump into PV to have the lens projected, but as its fine on the Amira i'm thinking its not the lens. Cheers, P IMG_7835.jp2
  10. Im getting a vignette on the 435ES from a rehoused canon FD 20mm - Obviously a lens designed for 35mm stills and should easily cover. Both on video assist and in the viewfinder. Other focal lengths seem to be better 24/35/55/85 all good. What am I missing? Please be gentle if I am having a brain fart. Paul IMG_7834.jp2
×
×
  • Create New...