ivan delenda

in El Greco y el Cine, SM wrote about Greco's point of view in "View of Toledo " and in " view of Toledo under the storm " in 16XX , ( this last is at the Metropolitan Museum - new york so TSM can visit). Greco painted the city of TOLEDO as if he shot with a 28 mm and not any other short . i am sure that most of you know the 8mm and the 9,7mm ( only 1,7 mm dude !! ), and you are not waiting me to explain the differnce between those two lenses. ivan - not true is was the only available in USSR - SM didnt shot with russian camera, at his time Russians didnt make any motion camera yet

what do u mean by puf puf,,,, see , films are not only technique !!!! and you Monsieur "puf puf " - as i guess - you know only about technique, and you think thats it ! go read some books and watch some films before puffpuffing please .

i am not a genius , i f not, i wont be here asking and re-asking questions,,,, ok , for Bethoven,,if he s born today, he will be DJing with PlasiKman,,,, so if i understand you well, there is no diff between 27 and 28 mm , unless if one is made before 1914 ,,, thanks very much for the informations

not beeing too literal ,,,i am not DOP, i am a Director yeah i know that 1 mm wont kill anyone,but to close,try to see it that way, 90° angle is not 91° ,,,1° i know , but go tell that to an architecte ,,, of course,,, i ll make tests and compare the two and will tell you about it ,,, of course,,, i ll make tests and compare the two and will tell you about it ,,,

yeah of course i will let you know , , but until i decide wich lens i need buy , am trying to know from people who used both 27 and 28 to tell what do they think,,, beside,am not sur you saw that text since it s not huge published,,but there as a filmmaker SM EISENSTEIN who wrote long long pages about the 27 and not the 28 ,,, i am thankfull for TSM and Audiris, but people i am kind of stoned , 1mm is nothing tho, 1 stop will be nothing too, or one filter wont be important,,, and you know it s not true,,, sorry ,,typing ; SM wrote about the 28 and not the 27,,,

yeah 1 mm : ) , but isn't the 1mm that makes the difference ? not trying to make zee cool , but 24 fps is 1 frame before 25 fps , no ?

thanks for that informations,,,but i am asking about the 28 and not 27 ...or you think they are the same ?

hi every one,,, anyone shot with 28 mm ? SM Eisenstein said it s the XTC lens,,,but practicly what do you think ? thanks ivan

great,,, i ll buy two Konvas 2m with some lomo speed lenses , and go for my shoot,,,

what if i have Konvas 2m ? i there any special advice ?

thanks guys,,, i cant afford very speed Zeiss, so i ll go for double exposure.if i ll discover any new galaxy , i ll make you know :)

Hello Downix,,, thanks for the advice,,, the LOMO 20 $ lens went to my collection :)it was in a shop in Paris.

Hello, i will be shooting soon in a desert, some of scenes are basicly night-shot stars. my producer told me that it s impossible to get stars on a film , and he said i have to find alternative ways ... is that true ? if not , anyone knows , if it s possible, and what s the tric , shutter speed, lens , and film i have to use ? thanks ivan

thank you Christian ,,, very surralist for me, you can buy a konvas lomo lens for 2O dollars,,, in one hand , i find that fantastic, but in other hand , what is that lens "mint" conditions for 20 box ? any one knows about LOMOS ? thanks ivan

hello, please i need an advice, is it better to buy a AAton super 16 , then blow up to 35 , or to buy a Konvas-Automat camera made in Russia in 1979. and what about the stock and labs , the difference between 16 and 35 is it that huge ?? thanks