Jump to content

Petr Kvapil

Basic Member
  • Posts

    16
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Petr Kvapil

  1. I wonder if a 4K Blu-ray with film shot on 35mm makes any sense, or if it's just a marketing gimmick.
  2. Thank you for the explanation. By the way, I recently saw Oppenheimer at IMAX in Prague, where it was screened in 70 mm. Unfortunately, I was sitting very close to the screen in the third row and not quite in the middle and the image on the screen was very distorted (especially in the closeups of the faces). I understand that the high height of the (panoramic) screen is mainly to blame, but it was a pretty jarring experience. I didn't get used to it until about halfway through the film.
  3. Sure. I mentioned him only as an example of a director who uses mostly wide lenses.
  4. Here is the book: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Anton_Wilson_s_Cinema_Workshop/18Ck5PZX_ZsC?hl=cs&gbpv=1&dq=cinema+workshop+lens+perspective&pg=PA99&printsec=frontcover https://archive.org/details/antonwilsonscine0000wils/page/98/mode/2up
  5. I found the book. It is called Anton Wilson's Cinema Workshop. You can find it on Google Books or in Internet archive. The information is on page 99 about Lens Perspective.
  6. I wish I could find that book. It was very technical. it said something about perspective and that film projector lenses have a certain focal length because the most common lens for film is 50mm, but that it also depends on what lenses the film was shot with and how far away from the screen the viewer is sitting in the cinema. Maybe I'm describing it wrong, but I remember being quite surprised by that information.
  7. Is it true that it is better to watch films shot with wide lenses (for example Terry Gilliam movies) in the cinema from the front rows and films shot with long lenses (for example Ridley Scott movies) from the back rows, otherwise the image is slightly distorted? I read that in a book once, but I can't remember where.
  8. I read that skin tones should fall in the 70 IRE, but it seems in movies they are darker. So what are the usual numbers? Thank you for any tips.
  9. Does using filters like Antique Suede filter or Tobacco filter on the camera have any advantage over color grading in post-production?
  10. Yes, many studio movies look very digital (almost like animated movies). I know there is a lot of CGI/Stagecraft going on, but sometimes it feels like the actors' faces are digitally retouched and the films are digitally lit. I wonder what are all the factors that lead to this.
  11. How does "look" of contemporary movies differ from the previous eras? For example in 80s movies saturated color displaced desaturated. Sharp, clean images displaced the tendency to graininess or diffusion in 1970s cinema. Steadicam largely replaced handheld camerawork and high-contrast lighting replaced the low-contrast “natural” look. How would you describe today's era?
  12. But this looks very unnatural. Like bad digital noise reduction.
  13. The Lord of the Rings tv series had a pretty big budget (over $400+ million for season 1). I dont think they used some quick solutions. The faces look CG to me. There is almost no skin texture. Maybe it is the heavy make up.
  14. A lot of films are lit with LEDs and don't look like this.
  15. I noticed recently that actors in some new movies look almost like CG characters. What is going on here? Is this some kind of digital retouching? It looks very unnatural. Here are some examples: The Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCLoZI-FOYA Pam & Tommy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJgH4y3raWc Nightmare Alley https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q81Yf46Oj3s
×
×
  • Create New...