Search the Community

EditportQuote Does diacetate film naturally stink of mothballs as it ages? Or has the film just been stored in a humidor can with a preservative in it? Examples of humidor film cans... From what I gather, the humidor film can was used for added humidity via water and not chemicals. But maybe they used the humidor cans for both. Photos: Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Archival Collection Here is what AI says about the mothball smell... Diacetate film, in the context of photographic and motion picture film, refers to a type of cellulose acetate base where two of the three hydroxyl groups on each glucose unit of the cellulose molecule have been replaced with acetyl groups. It was an early form of safety film, replacing the highly flammable nitrate film, and was used extensively in the early 20th century. Diacetate film is characterized by a characteristic smell of camphor or moth balls, and while it was a significant improvement over nitrate film, it did have some stability issues like shrinking and embrittlement, leading to its replacement by cellulose triacetate. Key Characteristics and History: Development: Diacetate film was developed by chemists in the early 20th century as a less flammable alternative to nitrate film. Chemical Composition: It's a cellulose acetate polymer where two of the three possible sites on each glucose unit are acetylated, according to the National Film and Sound Archive of Australia. Early Use: It was used in both sheet and roll film, particularly for 16mm cinema films, as noted by the National Archives. Limitations: Diacetate film did suffer from issues like shrinking, embrittlement, and distortion, leading to its eventual replacement by cellulose triacetate. "Vinegar Syndrome": Like other cellulose acetates, diacetate film is susceptible to "vinegar syndrome," a condition where it deteriorates due to the release of acetic acid, resulting in a vinegar smell, shrinkage, brittleness, and the formation of crystals. I'm thinking if the mothball smell is not a preservative, but a sign of deterioration; the reels need to be permanently aired out or at least stored in ventilated cans to de-gas. I have always kept them in non-ventilated metal cans thinking they were embalmed! Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Archival Collection Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Small Gauge Film Archive Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Advertising Archive Daniel D. Teoli Jr. VHS Video Archive Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Popular Culture Archive Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Audio Archive Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Social Documentary Photography

I have two super 8 films from 1978 and 79, where the footage was all processed at the same lab. Camera footage was Kodachrome 40 . I had not viewed the films in about ten years. Upon screening the the footage , which had all been perfectly exposed , now looks about 1 stop underexposed, with the colors obviously, now muted. It is apparent to me the film emulsion is degrading, my guess probably from insufficient stabilization in the original lab processing. I have Kodachrome 8mm films from the mid-60s that still look new. Has anyone experienced this? The film reels were stored in their individual closed plastic containers. I have now drilled holes to allow some air ventilation, although this has not been a problem with any of my films from the 60s. Has anyone encountered this? Any solutions to halt the degradation process? Thank you for any help.