Guest rajavel Posted July 25, 2006 Share Posted July 25, 2006 hi all one of the shots in a scene in my recently shot feature film.....has a mild shake....meaning ... a repetitive up and down movement of the image on the film.....i feel there might have been a problem in the camera at the time of exposing that scene.....what could it be?? is it pin register problem or what??? anyone ..please explain in detail. camera - Arri 3, shot at 24 fps, normal shutter, day scene. format - anamorphic , lens-cineovision 24 mm thanks cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Max Jacoby Posted July 25, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted July 25, 2006 That sounds like either a problem of the camera or of the post production (telecine or print). On a side note, I have heard of but never seen these anamorphic Cineovision lenses. As far as I gather they are Japanese. Would you have any more details, like focal lenghts, weight and stop, as well as how they compare to other anamorphic lenses? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Stephen Williams Posted July 26, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted July 26, 2006 hi allone of the shots in a scene in my recently shot feature film.....has a mild shake....meaning ... a repetitive up and down movement of the image on the film.....i feel there might have been a problem in the camera at the time of exposing that scene.....what could it be?? is it pin register problem or what??? anyone ..please explain in detail. camera - Arri 3, shot at 24 fps, normal shutter, day scene. format - anamorphic , lens-cineovision 24 mm thanks cheers! Hi, You need to do a double exposure steady test with the camera. Remenber the Arri III has only 1 registration pin and won't be as steady as a camera with dual pins. Stephen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddie bonfanti Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 That sounds like either a problem of the camera or of the post production (telecine or print). On a side note, I have heard of but never seen these anamorphic Cineovision lenses. As far as I gather they are Japanese. Would you have any more details, like focal lenghts, weight and stop, as well as how they compare to other anamorphic lenses? funny you said that, a japanese dop i worked with two days ago told me about them...i did a google and i found this. apparently theyre not longer being manufactured http://www.cineused.com/Anamorphic1.htm hope it helps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddie bonfanti Posted July 26, 2006 Share Posted July 26, 2006 sorry, its a long page and i forgot to mention that the part about the lenses is in the middle...i just past it here, there is not much to read anyway "Cineovision 2.35 (Japanese) Anamorphic prime lenses. No longer manufactured. PL mount. Excellent quality. In the last 10 years, I have seen one set sold used. The buyer bought them for the glass and had the mechanic's and barreling reworked. The new prices are... 24mm T 1.4, $ 32,000. 32mm T 1.4, $ 25,000. 40mm T 1.4, $ 25,000. 50mm T 1.4, $ 25,000. 100mm T 2.6, $ 25,000." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Max Jacoby Posted July 26, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted July 26, 2006 Thanks, I'd forgotten about that page. I'm curious what kind of glass is in there, maybe Canon? The recent British film 'The Great Ecxtasy of Robert Carmichael' was shot on them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandon Robinson Posted July 30, 2006 Share Posted July 30, 2006 This can be fixed pretty easily just so you know. We have had to do this in the past at my company, but we rent cameras and use various telecine places, so for us it was not worth looking into 'how it happened', but if this is your cam, you might have a problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Stephen Williams Posted July 30, 2006 Premium Member Share Posted July 30, 2006 This can be fixed pretty easily just so you know. Hi, A stabilised image will be noticeably softer. Far better to have a steady camera + scanner. Stephen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomas Clay Posted September 27, 2006 Share Posted September 27, 2006 Hi... Yes, we used the Cineovision lenses on Carmichael. We used them for their cold and stark yet slightly soft look - what one might call a "70s look". The main problem with the lenses is that you get some slight vinguetting, with a loss of focus around the edges under certain lighting conditions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now