Jump to content

Can someone give me some advice on this lense?


Recommended Posts

lense.jpg

 

 

It's from a Sony DXC-3000 - it's a Fuji zoom 10-120 - does anyone know what kind of mount that is?

 

I'm interested in selling the lense or the whole camera with the lense - any idea what it might be worth - or if anyone would need it - ie what kind of camera could it mount on to apart fromt he dxc 3000

 

thanks

 

Scot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

One of those is a "lens" not a "lense."

 

I'm quite sure that is a standard mount for professional video cameras. It would at least fit about any Sony camera. As for worth, check somewhere like visual products or check out ebay prices on similar items.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ReadyTeddy

You actually have the answer in front of you in the picture.

 

See the Fujinon FAQs on broadcast lenses:

 

http://www.fujinonbroadcast.com/cgi-bin/faq.cgi?idFaq=6

 

I can't read the codes because you are holding the lens upside down in the shot with the information...

 

I think it's a SONY B4 and should fit a variety of 2/3rd inch chip cameras.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys thank you all for your advice - btw the code is A12x10BRM-88 - which I checked out on that link.

 

So anyway do you think there would be a demand for it on eBay? I'd either sell the lense by itself, or with the Sony DXC-3000 it came with. The whole camera plus the case is quite heavy so shipping might be a problem for people overseas hence selling just the lense might be more appealing. Any ideas on this?

 

As far the spelling - that depends entirely where you're from! :)

 

thanks

Scot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
As far the spelling - that depends entirely where you're from! :)

 

I didn't realize that. Apologies. I guess my TA jobs at school have me too used to correcting that one :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As far the spelling - that depends entirely where you're from! :)

 

Webster himself actually kind of hijacked the English language because of nationalism. In his own dictionary, he changed a ton of words so that American English would be distinct from European English. Hence we have "color" instead of "colour" and many others. Didn't know "lense" was one of them, but I'm guessing that's the reason...not that it's pertinent to the present conversation...carry on...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
Webster himself actually kind of hijacked the English language because of nationalism. In his own dictionary, he changed a ton of words so that American English would be distinct from European English. Hence we have "color" instead of "colour" and many others. Didn't know "lense" was one of them, but I'm guessing that's the reason...not that it's pertinent to the present conversation...carry on...

 

 

That bastard. English has enough grammatical oddities that it doesn't need multiple correct spellings of things, too. :angry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...