Scott Willis Posted March 5, 2008 Share Posted March 5, 2008 I'm looking into my post-production workflow stuff for my final 16mm film projects this year. I really want to transfer to an HD format of some sort, but I cant' determine whether HDCAM is better for this than DVCPRO-HD. I understand the DVCPRO-HD subsampling 4:2:2 formula, but how does that compare with HDCAM's 3:1:1? Maybe i'm even focusing on the wrong details here. My gut instinct is telling me that the dvcpro format is more suited for video based work and not necessary for telecine. But i can't seem to back that up with any solid information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Brawley Posted March 5, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted March 5, 2008 I understand the DVCPRO-HD subsampling 4:2:2 formula, but how does that compare with HDCAM's 3:1:1? Maybe i'm even focusing on the wrong details here. I guess it depends...:-) DVCPRO HD has more compression than HDCAM. HDCAM's Colour sampling leaves a lot to be desired. Are you doing best light or going back for a tape to tape grade later ? If you're grading later, HDCAM is pretty limiting in my experience, mainly because of the colour space limitations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Willis Posted March 5, 2008 Author Share Posted March 5, 2008 Are you doing best light or going back for a tape to tape grade later ? If you're grading later, HDCAM is pretty limiting in my experience, mainly because of the colour space limitations. Yeah. I'm just going for the best light transfer now. Don't really have the resources or the time to go back and do a second go at it. Thanks for the tip about the color space and grading stuff. That's pretty much the info i was going for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Burke Posted March 5, 2008 Share Posted March 5, 2008 Yeah. I'm just going for the best light transfer now. Don't really have the resources or the time to go back and do a second go at it. Thanks for the tip about the color space and grading stuff. That's pretty much the info i was going for. Scott, where are you doing the transfer, National? If so, they can transfer to HD D5, which would trump either DVCpro HD or HDCAM. But the larger question is what format you can deal with. DVCPro HD is probably the cheapest and easiest to use because it is all firewire. They will also transfer to hard drive as uncompressed HD 10 bit. they did my transfer that way and I could not be more pleased. I think if you are limited on $$ as most are, the tk to hard drive is the best route. Hard drives are cheap and you can do a triple back up for probably less money than the deck rental for any of three video formats. The caveat for the hard drive route is processing power. You'll need a very fast computer with lots of fast storage, So doing an off line of sorts with any lower res codec is necessary. Really not that big of a deal. many have gone on and on about how tape is better and safer, but they are wrong. If on a mac, use the ProRes 422 HQ, it'll make things a lot easier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Rosenbloom Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 (edited) Interesting ... I just transferred a super 16mm short at Post Works, and they could not go directly from film to DVC-Pro HD; they said the deck does not keep perfect sync with the Spirit. So they went film to HDCAM, and then duped to DVC-Pro HD. 3:1:1??? Is this why our colors are so saturated??? (Funny, my contract says I get footage that is 4:2:2!) Edited March 6, 2008 by Jon Rosenbloom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk DeJonghe Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 The worst part about HDCAM (not SR) is that it is only 8 bits. If you do any kind of color correction there, it is easy to run into banding in the deeper shadows. 8 bit means 254 levels of grey per channel, 10 bit is 1023 levels, four times finer steps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Adrian Sierkowski Posted March 6, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted March 6, 2008 I've done S16mm transferrs right to DVCPROHD here in philadelphia without issue. The biggest problem was the 16minute run time off of a 66min DVCPRO tape. So you'll be using a lot of tapes, but I can't complain about how well it performed, and the post was pretty easy from what I hear from the director. Keep in mind, though, it was a short which is going to live on DVD only. If we were going to be outputting to anything else I'd've tried to get D5 over the DVCPRO or HDCAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Willis Posted March 6, 2008 Author Share Posted March 6, 2008 where are you doing the transfer, National? If so, they can transfer to HD D5, which would trump either DVCpro HD or HDCAM. But the larger question is what format you can deal with. DVCPro HD is probably the cheapest and easiest to use because it is all firewire. They will also transfer to hard drive as uncompressed HD 10 bit. they did my transfer that way and I could not be more pleased. I think if you are limited on $$ as most are, the tk to hard drive is the best route. Hard drives are cheap and you can do a triple back up for probably less money than the deck rental for any of three video formats. The caveat for the hard drive route is processing power. You'll need a very fast computer with lots of fast storage, So doing an off line of sorts with any lower res codec is necessary. Really not that big of a deal. many have gone on and on about how tape is better and safer, but they are wrong. If on a mac, use the ProRes 422 HQ, it'll make things a lot easier. Interesting. I wasn't sure whether I was going to do the transfer at National or at Postworks. I'll probably ride over to National and talk to someone face to face about my options. The HD 10-bit sounds like an awesome choice. I just bought a new 500gb hard-drive just for this semester's work and the computers they run at my school are pretty well setup. The worst part about HDCAM (not SR) is that it is only 8 bits. If you do any kind of color correction there, it is easy to run into banding in the deeper shadows.8 bit means 254 levels of grey per channel, 10 bit is 1023 levels, four times finer steps. Is dvdcpo-hd 10bit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted March 6, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted March 6, 2008 > Is dvdcpo-hd 10bit? Yes. However, if you do decide to go DVCPRO, you can migitage this to a certain extentby ensuring that your grading all takes place in 10. P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Burke Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Interesting. I wasn't sure whether I was going to do the transfer at National or at Postworks. I'll probably ride over to National and talk to someone face to face about my options. The HD 10-bit sounds like an awesome choice. I just bought a new 500gb hard-drive just for this semester's work and the computers they run at my school are pretty well setup. Is dvdcpo-hd 10bit? if you do go over to National, talk to STeve Baldwin, a great guy who helped me out tremendously with my short. I went the tapeless route (10 bit uncompressed HD). if you were really on top of your exposures and shot framing charts and at least a gray scale, you could get a really good best light for small money. If you have any questions about the work flow, PM me. chris Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Burke Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 > Is dvdcpo-hd 10bit? Yes. However, if you do decide to go DVCPRO, you can migitage this to a certain extentby ensuring that your grading all takes place in 10. P Are you sure it is ten bit. I have always been told that it was 8 bit. I know the new 2/3 inch camera they have out is a 10 bit HD camera, but the DVCpro HD format 10 bit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Site Sponsor Robert Houllahan Posted March 6, 2008 Site Sponsor Share Posted March 6, 2008 Are you sure it is ten bit. I have always been told that it was 8 bit. I know the new 2/3 inch camera they have out is a 10 bit HD camera, but the DVCpro HD format 10 bit? I am pretty sure DvcProHD is 8bit.. -Rob- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Brawley Posted March 6, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted March 6, 2008 > Is dvdcpo-hd 10bit? Yes. However, if you do decide to go DVCPRO, you can migitage this to a certain extentby ensuring that your grading all takes place in 10. P I think it's 8 Bit. 6.7:1 compression. 4:2:2. I seem to recall that HDCAM OUTPUT'S a 10 bit signal from the deck, but it's only recording 8. jb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Brawley Posted March 6, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted March 6, 2008 3:1:1??? Is this why our colors are so saturated??? (Funny, my contract says I get footage that is 4:2:2!) Well depending on the desk they grade form that's probably true. Until it hits the deck that is..... jb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted March 6, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted March 6, 2008 Oh, er, ah, yes, by which of course I mean "no". My point was that you can shoot 8 bit and then still get some advantage in posting 10. P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Drysdale Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Recording onto a hard drive is pretty common. However, I'd avoid HDCAM and DVPRO HD (both of which are 8bit), if at all possible, and keep everything 10 bit 4:2:2. Also, if you don't have a HDCAM or DVPRO HD VTR to play in the tapes, you'll have to rent one, which will add to your post production costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted March 7, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted March 7, 2008 Brian, if you know of anywhere that'll do a Spirit or similar transfer and give it to me on a firewire disk to walk out the door with, I'd be pleased to know about it! P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk DeJonghe Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Phil, I know at least one place, not far from here.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Drysdale Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Brian, if you know of anywhere that'll do a Spirit or similar transfer and give it to me on a firewire disk to walk out the door with, I'd be pleased to know about it! P I wasn't involved in the post production, but I know one short that I shot got transferred to a hard drive at Screen Scene in Dublin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted March 7, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted March 7, 2008 > I know at least one place, not far from here.. Yes Dirk a northlight would be lovely but a bit of a budgetary imposition... P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dirk DeJonghe Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Phil, The Northlight is still on my Christmas list. In the meantime I use the fine but slower Oxberry scanner but also a Shadow for real-time direct to disk transfers on my RaveHD as 10bit log DPX sequences (SD and HD). Just the transfer to the clients hard disk takes some time (filecopy from server to hard disk). I find LTO-3 very convenient too, faster than hard disk and inherent backup and long-term storage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Burke Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Phil, The Northlight is still on my Christmas list. In the meantime I use the fine but slower Oxberry scanner but also a Shadow for real-time direct to disk transfers on my RaveHD as 10bit log DPX sequences (SD and HD). Just the transfer to the clients hard disk takes some time (filecopy from server to hard disk). I find LTO-3 very convenient too, faster than hard disk and inherent backup and long-term storage. National Boston, where I had my transfer to hard drive done, insisted on at least a Firewire 800 drive for obvious reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted March 7, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted March 7, 2008 Dirk, do feel free to email me with your rate sheet for oxberry-to-disk :) I guess I'd be couriering my neg to Belgium, but hey... P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Rosenbloom Posted March 7, 2008 Share Posted March 7, 2008 Phil, The Northlight is still on my Christmas list. In the meantime I use the fine but slower Oxberry scanner but also a Shadow for real-time direct to disk transfers on my RaveHD as 10bit log DPX sequences (SD and HD). Just the transfer to the clients hard disk takes some time (filecopy from server to hard disk). I find LTO-3 very convenient too, faster than hard disk and inherent backup and long-term storage. What in the world are you talking about? Do I have to know this stuff if I want to continue pretending to be a DP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted March 7, 2008 Premium Member Share Posted March 7, 2008 LTO is great but the decks are a bit spendy for a one-off. And Jon - no - you just hire someone who does :D P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now