Jump to content

Recommended Posts

hi,

 

I have been reading on this board for some time now and what I was wondering is that i see allot of the lower budget music videos and short films beeing shot on the HVX200 and i actually talked to a few dp's here in holland who prefer this camera over for instance a digibeta or XDCAM, even thought the output wil be PAL sd video.

 

Now i'm asking this because I work with XDCAM and digibeta everyday and i think they are easier to work with and beter quality wise, or am i missing something here.

 

greetz,

 

Sander

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The HVX200 is cheaper. Although, the DP may also prefer shooting progressive instead of interlace and you also have the slow motion option.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

both the PDW530 and the DVW970 both have a 25p option, so i guess it's just i price thing then.

 

I just wondered causse i hardly every see anything on this board shot on digi or XD, it's either the hvx200 or it's shot on film or something like a viper etc ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a bit of a fashion thing with the HVX 200. For a SD delivery the DVW 970 would give nicer pictures. There's a lot of digi being shot, although there are increasing amounts on the HD cameras in Europe. The JVC HDV series does get plugged as well (also progressive) here, as do the other HDV cameras.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Cost of course is the biggest factor. A $6,000 camera vs. a $34,000 camera, and no proprietary deck costs needed for post.

 

There's a subtle difference between a downconverted HD image and an SD-originated image. The higher pixel count and finer edge enhancement of an HD-originated image will often produce a smoother, sharper, and less "video-like" image after downconversion to SD. In the case of the HVX200 the chips aren't really much better than SD, but after the camera does its internal up-rezzing you end up with something that doesn't look like anything an SD camera can create. Sometimes it's hard to get around the "size" of the detail enhancement of an SD camera, now matter you set the frequency or levels. And turning it off completely leaves the image too soft, compared to an HD camera.

 

Now obviously there are many times when a downconverted HD image and an SD image will be indistinguishable. But many people seem to favor the HVX for its unique "Panasonic look," which some consider more film-like than Sony.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Now obviously there are many times when a downconverted HD image and an SD image will be indistinguishable. But many people seem to favor the HVX for its unique "Panasonic look," which some consider more film-like than Sony.

 

Panasonic cameras do have their own look as against the Sony and in the end it's subjective choice.

 

I know someone who uses the JVC HD 250, using 16mm lenses on the JVC PL cine adapter and records the HD SDI out as DVPRO HD on a laptop. I suspect that might be more filmic looking than HVX 200. Although, you are getting into something more expensive than a HVX 200 and perhaps beginning to border onto a basic SI 2k Mini recording onto a laptop.

 

There are quite of few options now out there, although the budget at the lower end will always be the restricting factor on your camera choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
There are quite of few options now out there, although the budget at the lower end will always be the restricting factor on your camera choice.

 

I'm surprised that the HVX+35mm adapter setup has completely overshadowed the SDX900 for things like music videos. The SDX, with good glass, can create spectacular images with more "sharpness" than the HVX after it's gone through the resolution loss of the adapter. Pixel dimensions of the frame become less relevant when the image resolution isn't there in the first place...

 

And the SDX can be rented cheap with a basic zoom lens; for a little bit more you can get HD lenses and that camera SHINES. Plus, the DVCPRO/PRO50 post is easy to deal with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I'm surprised that the HVX+35mm adapter setup has completely overshadowed the SDX900 for things like music videos. The SDX, with good glass, can create spectacular images with more "sharpness" than the HVX after it's gone through the resolution loss of the adapter. Pixel dimensions of the frame become less relevant when the image resolution isn't there in the first place...

 

And the SDX can be rented cheap with a basic zoom lens; for a little bit more you can get HD lenses and that camera SHINES. Plus, the DVCPRO/PRO50 post is easy to deal with.

 

Yes, the SDX900 is great. Plus, there are quite a few looks that you can set up in the camera that would look wonderfully stylish in a music video.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Wooden Camera



    Tai Audio



    Paralinx LLC



    Glidecam



    Visual Products



    Serious Gear



    New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment



    Gamma Ray Digital Inc



    Broadcast Solutions Inc



    Metropolis Post



    Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS



    CineLab



    Rig Wheels Passport



    Abel Cine



    Ritter Battery


×
×
  • Create New...