Jump to content
chrislockerman

Shooting in the Jungle

Recommended Posts

Hello All,

I will be heading down to the jungles of Brazil in a few months to shoot a low budget action/thriller and I am beginning to put together a potential list of HD packages to bring with me. I am looking for your professional insight and advice on the various cameras available. I am considering everything (from the good ol' HVX 200 workhorse, the Varicam, the Sony EX-3, the Cinealta 900 series, to even the Canon Mark 5DII etc etc.). Maneuverability (this will be the jungle and I will be racing around following the subjects and action - very difficult for a big rig), low light capability and recording formats/storage are my main concerns. Cost will be addressed later. Your thoughts and experience would be much appreciated. Thank you!

-Christian

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to retain the film look AND you want to be able to capture fast action consider the Varicam. With the Varicam you can idle the camera at 24 frames per second for that beloved film look but when the action gets intense you can rev up the camera to 30 frames per second or even 60 frames per second. All of this will be recorded in a 60 frame per second stream at 720p resolution which can be copied to Blu-Ray disc. If handled correctly the motion will neither speed up or slow down but the cadence may change. Of course all of this is seriously thinking outside of the box but who knows maybe you can be the next Doug Trumble.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd maybe go with the EX3 only because it's a smaller camera (smaller than a vari cam) with a bigger chip (bigger than HVX) so you get better hand hold-ability but better low light performance; kind of a happy medium.

It's got a lighter codec in it, so you get a bit more record time per g/b. Some might worry that the codec will break apart recording all that detail; but in my own experience on the EX1, you should be ok (test in a Forrest if you can).

I would bring the Canon just to shoot some awesome production stills ;)

Now that's just me and what I'm comforatable with. I would highly recommend going with a camera you know, as you'll have enough troubles in the jungle as is, so might as well go with the camera that 1) renders the look you want easiest, and 2) you know pretty well. Test 'em all out!

My 2c

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes I think there is a bit too much fuss about this. Any <$10k camera does the same thing basically. It's just personal taste in terms of controls etc and look that appeals to you. And most all Panasonic cameras from Varicam to HVX are noisy, and that noise shows its face very easily. I'm forced to use my varicam for night events for a client and it's always a struggle to deal with low exposure and instant noise unless the blacks are crushed and then you are stuck with less exposure. Sony's new EX entries are probably as good as it gets in the jungle and anywhere else for the price. I suggested the H1 Canon for a friend who shot this doc and he says it was better than he ever expected;

 

http://www.metamorphosisfilm.com/METAMORPH...ETA%20HOME.html

 

You don't need a big camera as in size in the jungle nor want them. Any small prosumer camera will do more than you need. Canons are nice for 1/3", Sonys great for 1/2" and Panasonics noisy and most are simply uprezed SD chips so you give up something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for all of the insight. And you all make great points. What do you guys think about the rolling shutter shearing of the Sonys? I know their CMOS sensors are 1/2", but if my verticals are comprised as I zip around the jungle, I may be more inclined to stick with Panasonic. I will be testing an EX-3 later this month, so I will certainly check that out, but I would be interested in your thoughts ahead of time. Thanks again!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I finally saw my first EX1 Rolling shutter, while zoomed in about 80% or so doing 60 MPH along the highway, the street lights decisively bent.I haven't ever seen it under "normal" circumstances, e/g not zoomed in that far, and not shooting out the the side of the car.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have yet to use the EX1 or the Panasonic 170. I am thinking of buying one of these cameras and I am really on the fence. Both have their strengths and weaknesses. I would be concerned with the EX1 regards to how it would deal with all the leaves and detail.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, that'd be a concern on my mind as well, though from my experience the camera holds up pretty well "in the wild," though the locations I've taken 'er are nowhere near what one would find in the jungle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Although it was in a studio situation I thought that the EX-3 was brilliant!

Really nice camera, for what it is, blows all the other prosumer cameras out of the water.

 

I would use this, not only but also because it's semi-shoulder.

 

I hear what you are saying Bob but I would be a bit more concerned with latitude. You only have to look at 'Che' to see how it can all go wrong in a jungle!

Edited by Serge Teulon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I haven't had a chance to see "Che" yet (I will be viewing it shortly)... how did it all go wrong in the jungle? And what, in your opinion, happened?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I haven't had a chance to see "Che" yet (I will be viewing it shortly)... how did it all go wrong in the jungle? And what, in your opinion, happened?

 

"Che 2" was shot with very early releases of Reds. The highlights were decidely blown-out in many scenes. "Che 1" was shot with later builds and more experience and looked quite a bit better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would seriously consider film. Digital cameras suck for forests and jungles.

 

Too bad the 5D2 cannot shoot 24p. :(

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I would seriously consider film. Digital cameras suck for forests and jungles.

 

Too bad the 5D2 cannot shoot 24p. :(

 

Sony PDW700 is very good in low light, ultra quiet image.

Steve

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS



    Tai Audio



    Rig Wheels Passport



    New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment



    Serious Gear



    Glidecam



    Gamma Ray Digital Inc



    Metropolis Post



    Wooden Camera



    Broadcast Solutions Inc



    Abel Cine



    G-Force Grips



    Ritter Battery



    Paralinx LLC



    CineLab



    Visual Products



    FJS International



    Just Cinema Gear


    Cinematography Books and Gear
×
×
  • Create New...