Jim Nelson Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 Hi, can someone please help me out? If you don't have a monitor on set, and you want to see if the colors, brightness, contrast and exposure are correct, should you trust the viewfinder or the LCD screen? Thanks for your help. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Adrian Sierkowski Posted February 5, 2010 Premium Member Share Posted February 5, 2010 Neither unless you know how to properly calibrate them... same goes for a monitor. Use Zebras and Histogram functions to check for luminance; as for colors, you need a proper calibrated monitor and viewing environment to judge and/or experience. The Finder or an LCD on your camera ain't gonna really cut it, not will a great many of the LCDs on the market. You really want a nice CRT monitor or a high end professional LCD monitor which both cost a pretty penny and you need to make sure you set it to bars. Your other option is a vectrascope, but those are normally more expensive to rent and harder to translate than a good field monitor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Nelson Posted February 5, 2010 Author Share Posted February 5, 2010 But what if you can't have a monitor. is the viewfinder or the lcd screen more accurate to check if colors and luminance are correct? I understand that using a monitor is the best way and that you have to calibrate it, but what if you have no way of getting a monitor? should you trust the viewfinder or the lcd screen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Satsuki Murashige Posted February 5, 2010 Premium Member Share Posted February 5, 2010 If you don't have a monitor on set, and you want to see if the colors, brightness, contrast and exposure are correct, should you trust the viewfinder or the LCD screen? Depends, what camera system and viewfinder are we talking about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Nelson Posted February 5, 2010 Author Share Posted February 5, 2010 No camera system and viewfinder in particular. I just mean generally, which of the viewfinder or the lcd screen is more trustable? I think I heard a while back that you should trust the viewfinder, but I can't remember if that's exactly what that person said. So that why Im asking which one is more trustable for color, brightness, contrast and exposure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Drysdale Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 I wouldn't trust a prosumer camera V/F or LCD, although you can tell if the colour temperature is roughly right. The luminance values on a correctly set up high end 2/3" camera's B & W CRT viewfinder are usually OK to can make judgements from and many people do when shooting without a monitor. (Although, there are places which can throw it, like night clubs.) However, you also have the zebras to double check. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Nelson Posted February 5, 2010 Author Share Posted February 5, 2010 Thanks for your help. - So what you mean is that if you don't have a monitor and you want to check if the luminance is correct, you should trust the viewfinder? - You also can have the zebras appear on the lcd screen and on the viewfinder. Which one of these zebras is more trustable? or are they both the same? Thanks again and sorry if I keep insisting on this, I just want these things to be really clear :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Adrian Sierkowski Posted February 5, 2010 Premium Member Share Posted February 5, 2010 You should trust the Zebras and Historgram. They are the same and they are calibrated so they'll tell you what your luma is at. For your darks, if you have a B/W viewfinder, again properly set up, I'd trust that. Color is monitor only so far as I'm concerned, and even then only when calibrated. Now, given the choice between the V/f on my EX1 for example, and the LCD for color, I'll trust the LCD more because it's a better image than i'd get on a finder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Drysdale Posted February 5, 2010 Share Posted February 5, 2010 - So what you mean is that if you don't have a monitor and you want to check if the luminance is correct, you should trust the viewfinder? - You also can have the zebras appear on the lcd screen and on the viewfinder. Which one of these zebras is more trustable? or are they both the same? I wouldn't trust the LCD viewfinder found on prosumer cameras on its own without using a zebra. If you've got a high end broadcast camera eg Digibeta or HDCAM, the B & W cathode ray tube viewfinders, are pretty good and can be relied on most of the time if correctly set up. These are not the same as found on 1/3" cameras. The zebras will appear at the same level on the LCD screen or the V/F - the zebra level is set up in the camera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Chris Keth Posted February 5, 2010 Premium Member Share Posted February 5, 2010 If you've got a high end broadcast camera eg Digibeta or HDCAM, the B & W cathode ray tube viewfinders, are pretty good and can be relied on most of the time if correctly set up. These are not the same as found on 1/3" cameras. I agree with this and have to reiterate the part I bolded and underlined. I can't count the number of times I've gone to the trouble to set up the viewfinders on a set of cameras only to have the operators turn everything the whole way up and then bitch that the viewfinder doesn't match the monitor. It can be frustrating sometimes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Satsuki Murashige Posted February 6, 2010 Premium Member Share Posted February 6, 2010 No camera system and viewfinder in particular. I just mean generally, which of the viewfinder or the lcd screen is more trustable? Can't really help you then, as there is no "generally." It depends entirely on which camera LCD and which viewfinder we are talking about. If you're totally stumped, go with the zebras like Adrian says - that's really the best way given your situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Dolan Posted March 14, 2010 Share Posted March 14, 2010 Neither unless you know how to properly calibrate them... same goes for a monitor. Use Zebras and Histogram functions to check for luminance; as for colors, you need a proper calibrated monitor and viewing environment to judge and/or experience. The Finder or an LCD on your camera ain't gonna really cut it, not will a great many of the LCDs on the market. You really want a nice CRT monitor or a high end professional LCD monitor which both cost a pretty penny and you need to make sure you set it to bars.Your other option is a vectrascope, but those are normally more expensive to rent and harder to translate than a good field monitor. Why do you need such a monitor? Maybe a waveform is helpful with HD, but really you should learn your sensor the same way you learn your stocks, and expose off a meter. The Art of Cinematography shall not die! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Drysdale Posted March 14, 2010 Share Posted March 14, 2010 Why do you need such a monitor? Maybe a waveform is helpful with HD, but really you should learn your sensor the same way you learn your stocks, and expose off a meter. The Art of Cinematography shall not die! Perhaps more possible with the RAW cameras, but with other cameras you can have so many different menu set ups and you can be changing cameras so often that you do need these extra bits of kit to check the highlight clipping etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now