Jump to content

Am I a DOP?


Mark LS

Recommended Posts

At what point am I considered a DOP?

 

I love the title and often call myself a DOP, I have shot quite a lot of videos (as an one man crew, directing/camera/lighting), and while I'm experienced setting up the lights I own (Chimeras and a couple of divas) I have never been responsible for lighting outside of my own projects. They are all corporate projects and I don't use lighting to set mood but to get a good image.

 

Every single project I have shot I have myself listed as DOP, even the ones where there was no lights or just green screen.

 

Am I a DOP? I have knowledge of lighting, light-meter, lenses and own my own gear - no experience with film, or ever been hired by someone else.

 

Thanks for the comments, please be as blunt as you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As DOP means Director of Photography, it follows that you would have a crew of grips, electricians and camera to direct. When working as a one man band, say in documentary, or lifestyle programming, I would use the term Lighting Cameraman, or just Cameraman

 

Lighting Cameraman comes from the old British studio system, where there was a lighting cameraman & an operating cameraman. These days it's more often used in the way I have described.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The term was really born from the feature film industry. Although now of course the term applies equally to those who shoot commercials and narrative TV shows. I don't think guys that shoot news, weddings, or events, can call themselves DOPs. I know some do, and they get mad at me when I say the term doesn't apply to them. I don't even think people that shoot reality TV shows with handy cams can call themselves DOPs, after all they don't light or plan shots.

 

Here's an interesting tid bit, if you type "Cinematographer" into Wikipedia it uses our own David Mullen as an example of when ASC is used after a persons name. Have a look:

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinematographer

 

"Members of these organizations are entitled to put designatory letters after their names (e.g., M. David Mullen, ASC)."

 

Did you know that David?

 

R,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I've always been terribly embarrassed to be referred to by the title. I've done a few small shorts which, while I had a crew to work with, could not really be said to sufficiently legitimise the term, but it didn't stop them putting it above my name on the credits. Happily none of them made it onto IMDB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could really call yourself whatever you want if you're out shooting stuff but I wouldn't really say you're a DOP until you're actually shooting films with a crew and you're directing the photography. I'm still hesitant to go around calling myself a director until I've done more projects and get more of my films seen at festivals etc. and I've directed a decent amount of stuff and even won some awards (including best director at a festival). I guess I like to be more on the modest side of things when giving myself a title but I personally wouldn't call myself a DOP until I'd shot at least 5 decent short films, music videos, or commercials.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess I like to be more on the modest side of things when giving myself a title

 

Isn't that the typically Canadian approach. If you where an American you'd tell every one on the planet you where a top director five minutes after getting a short accepted into any festival. As a result you'd then have five agents, three managers, and two publicists. :D

 

Kidding aside, no one gets any where in this business unless they shamelessly blow their own horns.

 

R,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Kidding aside, no one gets any where in this business unless they shamelessly blow their own horns.

 

R,

 

Yeah I'm sure it helps...but I'm just starting fresh out of school and would like to get a few more projects under my belt before really calling myself a director. I guess anyone can call themselves whatever they want whenever they want really, but I like to feel like I've earned it a bit before really tooting my horn. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
would like to get a few more projects under my belt before really calling myself a director

Congratulations, you're exactly the kind of person we all wish populated the film industry. You're also doomed to hopeless, miserable failure.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

[/size]

You're also doomed to hopeless, miserable failure.

 

 

 

 

I see what you're saying but I don't think you're right about that. I don't think going around tooting your horn has anything to do with being successful. It has everything to do with doing good work. Obviously you have to promote yourself a bit and try to get your name out there...but I see so many terrible filmmakers making crappy low budget zombie movies and cliché rap music videos and they're really not going to get any further than where they're at now because no bigger companies are going to pick them up simply because their work is bad. I truly believe good work will prevail. You can do as many crappy projects as you want and make a million posts on twitter and facebook about how you're a big director with your IMDB page but it doesn't mean poop if your films suck.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

but I see so many terrible filmmakers making crappy low budget zombie movies and cliché rap music videos

 

Hmmm, well this is where James Cameron and Peter Jackson came from, look at them now.

 

R,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm, well this is where James Cameron and Peter Jackson came from, look at them now.

 

R,

 

 

Not exactly....James Cameron's film were quite original at the time...as were Peter Jackson's if you've seen them. They were both innovative as hell and showed people things they had never seen before. Neither of them made cliché zombie films or crappy rap music videos (those things were barely even being done in their day).

 

I stand by what I said about good films being better than good self promotion. Obviously you can't be completely quiet and do no promotion...but without good films, you won't be going far. You might be able to get some people to notice you and get some attention by tooting your horn but once you've got everyone's attention you better have something that will impress them or you'll never move up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not exactly....James Cameron's film were quite original at the time...as were Peter Jackson's if you've seen them.

 

What I am saying is that Jackson self describes his early work as "splatter movies."

 

Cameron made a self described, "flying pirana movie". A low budget genre pic that also relied heavily on the use of naked women.

 

And of course Sam Raimi made a name for himself with Evil Dead, also from the low budget horror genre. It was a well made genre film of course.

 

I agree that well made work is never a draw back. However, I have seen some incredible short films at film festivals and the makers of those films are still flipping burgers. At the other end of the spectrum I have seen guys that have made poor to fair short films move up the ladder at break neck speed.

 

What's the logic to this? I dunno there isn't any "logic" in this business.

 

R,

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When working as a one man band, say in documentary, or lifestyle programming, I would use the term Lighting Cameraman, or just Cameraman

That's fine for you and for the original poster - but it's not a term that is available to the rising numbers of women in the business.

 

In this part of the world at least, the term cameraman tends not to be used for that very reason. After all, we don't have "editman" or "microphoneman" - and "continuity girl" went the way of the dinosaur.

 

OK, don't bother to reply about "best boy". It's a curiosity, not a useful example.

 

What is wrong with "Cinematographer" - after all, ACS, ASC, CSC, BSC and countless numbers of other organisations seem comfortable with it -and many of them include levels below accredited DOPs among their members.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fine for you and for the original poster - but it's not a term that is available to the rising numbers of women in the business.

 

In this part of the world at least, the term cameraman tends not to be used for that very reason. After all, we don't have "editman" or "microphoneman" - and "continuity girl" went the way of the dinosaur.

 

What is wrong with "Cinematographer" - after all, ACS, ASC, CSC, BSC and countless numbers of other organisations seem comfortable with it -and many of them include levels below accredited DOPs among their members.

 

If the term Lighting Cameraman offends, then perhaps just Lighting Camera would do.

 

As for Cinematographer, I spent many years shooting news, reality tv, and documentary. At no point would I have described my work as Cinematography.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I've said this before, but there is a bit of a problem with this sort of thing when you do the sort of thing I used to do, which was sort of middling short films and music videos. You have a crew, you have lights and filters and lenses, it'll be graded, but frankly it's all pretty low end. What on earth title are you supposed to take?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've made a couple of shorts with cast and crew now and auditioned rehearsed and directed the films and so feel like a bona fide Director. My second film I was the DP Camera operator Director and Production manager and loved every minute of it. FULL CONTROL Yeah baby.

 

I can call myself by those titles and know I earned them. If I was suddenly placed in a Hollywood major production I don't know how that would be But I have a feeling a lot easier than what I've already done and if not. So what.

 

Mark

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Uhh... yeah this is kind of sad. Somewhere along the way the currency of "Director of Photography" has gotten devalued. Maybe it happened when decent DV cameras hit the market at $4K.

 

Although it never hurts to "toot your own horn" in da Biz, try to remember what the great Mississippi philosopher Dizzy Dean, had to say. "It ain't bragging if you can do (have done) it."

 

Me personally, I'd never call myself a DP unless I'd run a complete crew with at least three in each department, lit a six block long nite shoot w/ car stunts, and seen the results on the Big Screen or at least a cable/satellite network.

 

solamente mi dos centavos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...