Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Frank DiBugnara

AF-100 Internal vs. AJA Ki-Pro Recording

Recommended Posts

I have a green screen shoot coming up with the AF-100 and have the option to record on the Ki-Pro Mini via HD-SDI.

 

1) Does anyone have any thoughts on the advantages and disadvantages of this versus recording internally (mostly in regards to image quality rather than recording time, etc)?

 

2) Also, if I do go this route, it looks as though the camera, even in Psf mode, only sends 1080i out of its SDI, even if the internal camera recording setting is set to progressive.

 

I'm assuming this means that if Psf is selected in the video output preferences, that the progressive output is "preserved" within the interlace output.

 

In other words, even though the signal is being sent out of the camera is interlaced, there is still a progressive pattern "embedded" in the interlaced signal and thus the final effect of the recorded image on the Ki-Pro will be that of a progressive signal. Correct?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The only advantage to the Mini here is that it uses a lot less compression than the AF-100, about 220 Mbps vs. 25 Mbps. The camera is limited to 422 8 bit, so that's what you'd get from the KiPro Mini as well. For a green screen, the weakest link is that all this is only 422, yielding softer mattes. The 8 bitness of it also limits you in color correction.

 

 

 

 

 

-- J.S.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Compression is a nightmare in postpro. The camera uses AVCHD as I recall and this is meant for amateur movies not for professional greenscreen work. Do yourself a favour and get the AJA with the camera.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have the option, your editor will probably thank you for using AJA rather than AVCHD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought I'd post a follow-up for the benefit of anyone interested.

 

We ended up shooting with the Ki Pro set to 422HQ. The resulting files were about the size of RED One 4K files and looked pretty good. We were able to pull an excellent key fairly easily. We put it up against some previous RED One MX 4K footage and, of course, the RED was sharper.

 

Overall, I think the results were very good and I'd consider this set up for future green-screen stuff that would not necessarily benefit from getting a "2 for 1" focal length when shooting at 4K and finishing at 1080.

 

Another note is that without a "raw" output from the camera, it is very easy to "bake in" some undesirable settings. Most notably, I discovered that the camera's default settings are really not neutral. Even some settings that have a default value of "0" are really much more neutral at something like "-7", for example. So it's very important to go through all those settings before shooting. I ended up manually emulating the look that we've come to traditionally associate with a "raw" image (very low contrast, desaturated, etc).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  


  • Broadcast Solutions Inc



    Visual Products



    Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS



    G-Force Grips



    Rig Wheels Passport



    Tai Audio



    Just Cinema Gear



    Ritter Battery



    Metropolis Post



    Gamma Ray Digital Inc



    CineLab



    Wooden Camera



    Glidecam



    Paralinx LLC



    The Original Slider



    FJS International



    Abel Cine



    New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment



    Serious Gear


    Cinematography Books and Gear
×
×
  • Create New...