Brian Alan Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Does anyone know of a beam splitter available with a prism behind the lens? Old Bolex cameras used to use them for the view finder. Working on a project and I was researching the idea. It wouldn't be for 3D purposes at all. Actually it's for something a little more experimental and a new effect/idea (and no it's not HDR). Any information would be great. If I have to create my own I'm willing too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan kessler Posted February 17, 2012 Share Posted February 17, 2012 Well, I guess you didn't like the answer I gave you before, but I'm not sure you understand what a beam splitter is, either. Beam splitters are nothing more than partial reflectors. They "split" a light beam by transmitting part of it while reflecting the rest of it. They do not include lenses. They can be positioned behind or between lenses, as they are in film and video cameras, for various purposes. Whatever it is you are trying to build, the beamsplitter will be either a prism, a plate or a pellicle. There may be more than one beamsplitter in the optical path, but any other components, lenses or otherwise, are not really part of the beamsplitter. You need to describe your project in more depth to get any better answers, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Alan Posted February 18, 2012 Author Share Posted February 18, 2012 I didn't see an answer I thought I had made a post but I couldn't find it for some reason. Anyway, I know it doesn't "include" a lens. I meant that I would like to make or purchase a splitter so that I could capture two of the same image with one lens. One lens with the image directed too two sensors. So I could say have one PL mount then a splitter behind it sending the light to two GH2's. I know that there are in front of the lens splitters (like the ones in current use for 3D) and then there are the prism style splitters "behind the lens" style, again I know it's not an actual part of the lens. I was thinking a three way tube style system. Pretty much a system that would allow you to have the male ends of the GH2 fittings so they twist on, then a female PL fitting. Then a rail system to hold everything in place. Crude drawing...This is what I mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Alan Posted February 18, 2012 Author Share Posted February 18, 2012 Thanks for the link too Anchor Optics, they have what it looks like I would need (cube splitters from 35mm-50mm). finding the tube is going to be the trick or maybe I could just make it out a sheet metal box. Sorry for the double post if a mod could delete the other one in camera accessories that would be great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Millar Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Your drawing is wrong ... Although there is a lot more info available - you may as well read up more and research from the place you'll likely buy stuff from: http://www.edmundoptics.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan kessler Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 (edited) As Chris indicated, your drawing needs to be changed. The camera that is presently on the left will be moved below the prism along the same axis as the lens. The camera on the right will stay as is. One of many other issues to consider is the back focal length, or flange focal distance. With a PL mount, you are using lenses that are designed to focus an image 52mm behind the front surface of the lens port. You must carefully compute the total distance through the prism to the image sensors. That one problem alone could scuttle your design. If you want the image position to be exactly the same for both cameras, then you must provide the means to align the rig with pixel precision, then lock up ROCK SOLID. Nothing can move. The tiniest wiggle will ruin it. Are you good with machine tools? Edited February 19, 2012 by dan kessler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan kessler Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Of course, all of this begs the question, what will a rig like this give you that you can't get with a single camera and After Effects? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Alan Posted February 19, 2012 Author Share Posted February 19, 2012 Not everything in the world is about after effects. :) An organization out of the UK came up with a new software thats kind of the equivalent too long exposure photos for film. I would rather not give away the use for it as I think it would be wise to keep it with my self. I need one camera capturing the normal footage and one inputting into this program at the same time. It's not a filter, it needs to be done with recorded image at the same time you acquire the footage. Thus I need to use a beam split setup. I will ALSO be using after effects and rotoscoping too remove areas that I don't want the effect applied too, but I can't do it if I don't have two versions of the footage. :) I have a friend thats is good with machine/tooling work who would assist in the construction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Millar Posted February 19, 2012 Share Posted February 19, 2012 Dan refers to the clearance issue I mentioned in your tilt/shift thread ... You really need to think about that. Hmmm let me guess, are you playing around with 360+ shutter angles ? 180 + 180 = 360 with one camera out of phase with other by 1/(2*fps) Once you have those if you shoot fast enough footage you can effectively dial in your frame rate and shutter angle after the fact ;) Have fun ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Alan Posted February 19, 2012 Author Share Posted February 19, 2012 Dan refers to the clearance issue I mentioned in your tilt/shift thread ... You really need to think about that. Hmmm let me guess, are you playing around with 360+ shutter angles ? 180 + 180 = 360 with one camera out of phase with other by 1/(2*fps) Once you have those if you shoot fast enough footage you can effectively dial in your frame rate and shutter angle after the fact ;) Have fun ! I will check that out as well and start learning, but actually thats not what I was going to do. I want the girl dancing with the light and the light staying frozen in the air, because I'm using a strobing led there will be individual dots in the air, then I can go in and slowly take them out one by one, thus having a moving light pattern in the air. There are some examples with junk cameras they used in these videos. It can work with HD and non of these videos did anything with lighting or camera setup to get different looks. I sent you a PM chris with a link. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now