Daniel Jackson Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 Having enjoyed both of Daniel Craig's outings as James Bond 007 I am really looking forward to his latest offering, Skyfall. Having watched the teaser trailer for it last night and knowing who is in front of and behind the camera I know I will NOT be disappointed. What are your initial opinions? http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=8757 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Drysdale Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 Having enjoyed both of Daniel Craig's outings as James Bond 007 I am really looking forward to his latest offering, Skyfall. Having watched the teaser trailer for it last night and knowing who is in front of and behind the camera I know I will NOT be disappointed. What are your initial opinions? http://www.blu-ray.com/news/?id=8757 I hope they drop the Bourne style stuff, it was a bit of a mess in the last film. It has a logic in the Bourne films, it just looks tacked on in the Bond films. It being darker isn't a problem, the books were pretty dark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KH Martin Posted May 23, 2012 Share Posted May 23, 2012 I thought they've been promising to lighten up with this third one, so this is like Connery and Moore's third (GOLDFINGER and SPY WHO LOVED ME) ... I do NOT get that impression at all from the trailer. Despite the ADD cutting, I thought QUANTUM did wonders making up for all the plotting silliness in CASINO and I was almost able to stand Craig in QUANTUM, though he should be second henchman from the left with that face, not Bond at all. The Mendes/Deakins/Gassner combo is a good one (I have a hard time reconciling Bond & Digital, but if it had to be, then Deakins is the right guy to do it), but I find Logan to be a very weak link in the writing dept. No witty dialog to speak of in the trailer, but it's early days yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darrell Ayer Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 I thought they've been promising to lighten up with this third one, so this is like Connery and Moore's third (GOLDFINGER and SPY WHO LOVED ME) ... I do NOT get that impression at all from the trailer. Despite the ADD cutting, I thought QUANTUM did wonders making up for all the plotting silliness in CASINO and I was almost able to stand Craig in QUANTUM, though he should be second henchman from the left with that face, not Bond at all. KH, Not to be a purist snob, but please read the books and see where the character comes from. Daniel Craig is an almost perfect match to Fleming's original vision. Also the books aren't lighthearted or cheeky in the slightest. Darrell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KH Martin Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 KH, Not to be a purist snob, but please read the books and see where the character comes from. Daniel Craig is an almost perfect match to Fleming's original vision. Also the books aren't lighthearted or cheeky in the slightest. Darrell I've owned Fleming's entire Bond series in hardcover since I was a teen, along with John Pearson's 'biography' of 007 (which is practically an extension of Fleming it reads so well) and have reread them religiously over the last 36 years. Craig matches the craggy-faced thug working for LeChiffre in the original novel, and ain't nothing like Bond. DALTON is the near-perfect match for Fleming's Bond, the Bond of CR's 'nature of evil' chapter and especially of the later books when he is more world weary and cynical. Connery's Bond is wonderful but its own thing, apart from Fleming (probably as it should be.) Brosnan gets a bad rap, but a lot of that is crap direction and abominations for scripts ... see him in TAILOR OF PANAMA and you will see a brutal side that would have made Bond seem real, assuming Boorman ever got to direct PB in a 007 flick. And yeah, the reason I'm skipping mentioning Roger Moore (who would be fine if he were playing Bond's gay uncle, if he only had one) is that I spent his entire tenure waiting for the day when somebody would take this seriously again. I can't blame Craig for CR's writing of the character, and I won't give him credit for QUANTUM's more mature outlook, which to my eyes benefited him enormously. But he has no more business playing Bond than Taylor Negron. Even Craig's much-vaunted sexuality doesn't ring true - take a look at the scene in CR when he picks up Solange, the asst baddie's girlfriend. He is practically swallowing nervously waiting for her to say yes - it is more like Don Knotts with a girl than the James Bond of either film or Fleming. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Bill DiPietra Posted May 24, 2012 Premium Member Share Posted May 24, 2012 The Bond franchise ended for me when Sean Connery no longer starred in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Holland Posted May 24, 2012 Share Posted May 24, 2012 Agreed Bill but "Diamonds are for Ever" is a real stinker !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Bill DiPietra Posted May 25, 2012 Premium Member Share Posted May 25, 2012 Agreed Bill but "Diamonds are for Ever" is a real stinker !!! Yep...that was just a weird one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Jackson Posted May 29, 2012 Author Share Posted May 29, 2012 I enjoyed Moore's Bond when I was a kid, but once my balls hit the floor I wanted some one who took the role more seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Phil Rhodes Posted May 29, 2012 Premium Member Share Posted May 29, 2012 I'm with Mr. Jackson on this. No balls reference intended. P Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Hulnick Posted May 30, 2012 Share Posted May 30, 2012 I don't want a squeaky clean, straight down the line hero. I want that dirty, in your face, don't give a **(obscenity removed)**, morally ambiguous hero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel Jackson Posted June 5, 2012 Author Share Posted June 5, 2012 Moore's Bond got more and more ridiculous. Almost like a parody of itself. Saying that, there were some good moments if you look hard enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Markshaw Posted June 12, 2012 Share Posted June 12, 2012 I believe this will be a defining moment for the Bond franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brian Hulnick Posted June 19, 2012 Share Posted June 19, 2012 I'm glad the writing has gotten a lot better. Some of the 70's stuff was atrocious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now