Jose luis villar Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 This film has a lot of grain for super 8. However, with a bit of post production, noise reduction and sharpening, can look better, but the best for telecine is the negative Kodak Vision 3. The thing is that this film is mainly for fans of the projection, In this case it is an acceptable alternative. For scanning, Kodak Vision 3 is the way to go. https://vimeo.com/68868281 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Cunningham Posted June 22, 2013 Share Posted June 22, 2013 Awesome! Not E100D, but it will do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member Jeremy Cavanagh Posted June 23, 2013 Premium Member Share Posted June 23, 2013 The horses seemed to like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Dunn Posted June 23, 2013 Share Posted June 23, 2013 Well that wouldn't cause me to change my view that I won't use Super-8 again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Rodgers Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 I really like the film grain! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viktor Gibarti Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 My test! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Gladstone Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 Viktor, it looks great! A little on the desaturated side, but I really dig it. Was it an overcast day or sunny when you shot this stuff? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viktor Gibarti Posted October 27, 2013 Share Posted October 27, 2013 Thanks Josh! The scan is little bit poor! The film is much better on projecting. This film is grainy and more saturated in real…. Was shooted it an overcast day!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ignacio benedeti Posted December 1, 2013 Share Posted December 1, 2013 (edited) Hi: my test of the very cheap AGFA Aviphot loaded in Single-8 cartridges using the Fuji ZC1000. First half is exposed at 100 ASA with 1 stop pull processinG to get less grain. Second half, at 200 ASA. Spanish sound track only: I'm sorry. Edited December 1, 2013 by ignacio benedeti Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Friedemann Wachsmuth Posted December 1, 2013 Share Posted December 1, 2013 Hey Ignacio, grain is hard to judge on a vimeo clip due to compression -- would you say that pull-1 really had a visible impact on the grain? My expereince with pulling Agfa reversal stock is that it does almost nothing to the grain, but I haven't tried yet pulling with the 200D... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose luis villar Posted December 1, 2013 Author Share Posted December 1, 2013 I think the 200d has too much grain for super 8, but that's just my personal taste. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ignacio benedeti Posted December 1, 2013 Share Posted December 1, 2013 Hi: yes, Aviphot has less grain and a bit more latitude exposed at 100 ASA and with 1 stop pull processing. Of course, this stock is very grainy but no more than the old Ektachrome 160, Agfachrome160 or Fujichrome RT200N. In my opinion, is a good film for manual editig and telecine: so, very good for some projects, with both worlds in your hands. Colour palette is interesting for some shooting, as this one, a medieval market. Also, I like the very cheap price of Aviphot if you buy it in 72 mts spools to reload Single-8 cartridges. The Aviphot is coated on a poliester base, another strong point thinking in archive purposes of special events as weddings, Christining, etc. CINEcerely, Ignacio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now