Jump to content

Vision3 50d shot.


Jose luis villar

Recommended Posts

Hi David, the color correction is very simple, is made with rgb curves in Premiere Pro, Neat application is minimal, I do not like to clean much grain because it creates an image plastic video.

Look at these screenshots,

 

z5d8.jpg

 

7syy.jpg

 

d4pn.jpg

 

 

Gabriele, the telecine is done in http://ochoypico.com/super8-telecine/

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

very interesting ... the quality of the transfer seems very good , even tough from the specs seems to be a telecine and not even a data scanner ... nonetheless beautiful . I guess that the quality of the Beaulieu is an important factor too ...

 

i just shot some Vision 3 200T but i have not seen it yet because i was trying to get Pro8mm (considering that i got Film + processing + scan package ) to scan in LOG but they ended up saying that they cannot do it in LOG ... so i guess i have to look somewhere else ...

 

ps: was your telecine in HD , would you mind share just a couple of HD frames ? how did you get it back ? DPX or Qt?

 

thanks

g

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...i just shot some Vision 3 200T but i have not seen it yet because i was trying to get Pro8mm (considering that i got Film + processing + scan package ) to scan in LOG but they ended up saying that they cannot do it in LOG ... so i guess i have to look somewhere else ...

 

Technically, an uncorrected film negative is something of a log image. It still has a slight contrast curve to it, but its still flatter than rec709 or if you made a projecting print. You'll never get a flat curve from film like that of a digital camera. You don't need to. Film generally has a higher dynamic range than digital to begin with and still preserves highlights better than most of todays digital cameras.

 

If you still really wanted it, the only way you're going to get a LOG looking image is if you use a DI film.

 

Thanks for reminding me about this stock. I have a roll of it in 35mm staring at me every time I open the fridge. I never thought to consider it for super-8. The grain holds up extremely well!. That is one sharp piece of glass!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Beautiful transfer. I've yet to try 50D now I really must buy a few rolls.I'm always put off by the scan costs. It would be really interesting to see a scan of 50D going through the new super8 film camera being worked on when it comes out. I know unsteadiness is a quirk of super8 but if this stock went through that camera with it's proper film feed it would effectively be 16mm!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

JL,

 

Both the 50D and mk-of look extremely good and the mk-of showed a lot of work went into the shoot. I'm assuming this is a client commission and if so I'm curious as to how you persuaded the client to let you shoot in Super 8 rather than 16 or digital or even 35?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Jeremy,

 

This is a good question, sorry for my English I'll try to explain, I have a Phaseone, that costs more than a Red, the reason that I shot in s8 is only because I think s8 good scan is the best way that people who do not understand film or digital, and see a difference today in the West is all vintage fashion.
For my shoot s16 or s8 is the same for costs in a production like this, I prefer the portability and customer s8, s8 or Alexa gives you the same.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...