Jump to content

Blackmagic Cintel Film Scanner....


Robert Houllahan

Recommended Posts

  • Site Sponsor

I would suggest rescanning the 35mm that you had an issue with on another machine, one with known good registration, as a comparison. I have recently scanned 35mm ECN to 4K on our Pin Registered Xena and didn't see movement. It is possible that the BMD scanner software is not a sophisticated as the registration software in other machines which have had more time and experience figuring this issue out.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Sponsor

I think what might be happening with the Cintel is that to get enough light to scan at 24 or 30fps the sensor will have problems with seeing contrast on the perforation. Does the machine have a ND filter strip in the gate where the perfs are? That's a "solution" other scanner manufacturers have tried and it is also fraught with issues. Assuming a 12bit cmos sensor (which are usually noisier than CCD) BMD probably has to push the exposure up to avoid having noise in the hilites and at the higher frame rates the perf hole will clip the sensor and make edge detection difficult.

 

I suspect that they are going to have ongoing issues with this considering the speed of the scan and the sensor they are using.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

The Blackmagic folks love film; that's a big part of why they bought and love Resolve and well as Cintel. I know they've been working on that scanner for a long time and I'm sure they wanted it to be awesome. The lack of fanfare with the release makes me wonder if they aren't particularly happy with it either.

 

An Arri III is pin registered and in my experience fairly consistent and solid so I would have Perry or Robert scan the same film and see if they have the same registration issues.

 

As long as they can get 2K out of 16mm I'd be fine, but if they aren't, they need to go back to the drawing board on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to the manual for the Cintel scanner, the resolutions for 16mm are ...odd.

 

1903x1143 for Super16

1581x1154 for Standard 16

 

These resolutions betray an old school way of looking at scanning, and it make sense since the basic design is based on an older Cintel model. This is something that's baked into the hardware - I think they'd need to do some major work to be able to do 4k scanning of 16mm on this machine, or even 2k. Not saying they can't, but it'd require significant mechanical changes to the scanner, and that's a bigger deal than tweaking some software.

 

To my mind, the Cintel is a non-starter for 16mm. Lately we've been doing a ton of 4k 16mm scanning of freshly shot film on the ScanStation and it looks amazing.

Edited by Perry Paolantonio
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Site Sponsor

I think part of the cost saving on the BMD Cintel is that the lens and sensor are fixed in place so no practical way to set the sensor and lens to fill the sensor area with a 16mm frame. I can only imagine that the under sampled resolution looks pretty bad on this machine.

 

16mm looks great at 4K to eat that BBC.

 

;-)

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...