Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I really can’t thank you enough, Satsuki, for putting up with me. You’ve explained it beautifully, as you always do. I freaked out when I saw that camera when I first saw it. I couldn’t believe I haven’t seen anything like it before. Later, more and more it seemed like some sort of a modified Canon EOS.

 

There are two more videos of pretty much the same:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZfRMkj5U1w

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Storaro is known for being elegant dresser, I still remember the behind the scenes of Apocalypse Now and how well dressed he was in the middle of the jungle :) he got Italian class.

 

The first anecdote I read about him was that quote from Francis Ford Coppola about how Vittorio is the only man Francis knows who could fall off a ladder into mud and not get dirty.

Edited by Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Another interview with Vittorio Storaro!

 

Screencaps!

 

http://www.woodyallenpages.com/2016/04/cafe-society-new-images-from-vittorio-storaro-interview/

 

http://blog.screenweek.it/2016/04/cafe-society-vittorio-storaro-concepito-quattro-aspetti-diversi-nuove-immagini-508809.php

 

I’d love to hear som impressions!

Edited by Alexandros Angelopoulos Apostolos
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Looks really great! I love all the hard light he uses in the background, very interesting shapes and colors. I'm assuming the film will be cut much slower than the trailer, as per usual with Allen's other films. Will be great to let the eye linger and roam through all the detail in the frames.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That light in Steve Carell character’s office sure is harsh! I understand that Storaro wanted to evoke the Californian Sun.

 

I keep thinking why he chose to use white light for the Bronx family apartment. I guess such apartments in those days were lit with that kind of light, and not with incandescent light bulbs.

 

Then there are those baffling jarred white lights in that night club.

 

The powerful light pointing right at the camera in that library or whatever it is?

 

It was also a bit jarring to see that softened frame introducing Vonnie. Suddenly you go from supersharpness into that softness.

 

California is a bit to monochrome for me. A little bit too much “sepia” (“sepia” nowadays means a lot of different things to different people so thus the quotation marks). Just look at those characters at that pool party when the Oscar-winning screenwriter speaks – their costumes are almost identical and match the surroundings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Storaro is almost certainly using white light versus colored light for a story purpose, behind which he has constructed a philosophical structure to the use of different colors for the film. Until he explains it to us, we can only guess what the meanings of certain colors are intended to be.

 

My guess is that 'white' light represents balance, the home, where things are safe, stable, and boring. The beginning and end of the journey. Hence New York where the character begins (and, I'm assuming, ends) his travels. The other colors Storaro frequently assigns meanings to: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, violet. You can make your best guesses on what those might be. I'm not going to attempt that though!

 

I would wait to see the film in its entirety before making further judgments. The lighting and color scheme probably had to be seen in context to make sense. Storaro is a bit unique in this way, he is less focused on making individual pretty pictures than he is on telling a story with light and color, which is why he prefers the term 'writer of light' rather than 'painter of light' for what he does.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

David, yeah, I spoke too soon: only after I’ve posted that I saw that it was a film projection they are attending. I was to focussed the first time on the projector light. It was pretty much the only thing I saw the first time I watched the trailer.

 

You’ve been awfully quiet; I presume you want to see the whole film before you speak?

 

Satsuki, you’re on the right path: have you read the huge feature in Film and Digital Times about the film I posted above? Here’s the direct link:

 

http://www.filmanddigitaltimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/75FDTimes-Storaro-PassageToDigital.pdf

 

In it, he says that there are four parts to the story: among them, one is lunar Bronx and another the sunny Hollywood. The third one is when the main character comes back to New York from Hollywood to work with his brother in the night club – it is the combination of the previous two I listed, Storaro says. Thus the clash between white and yellow light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I don't know how I feel about the look of that trailer. I think I find the combination of the deeper depth of field Storaro has used, when combined with the insane detail (and 'cleanliness') of the F65, a bit distractingly 'digital' for my tastes.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick pop up from me to let you know about The Hollywood Reporter interview:

 

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/features/woody-allen-interview-he-wont-889678

 

Nothing cinematographically relevant, except perhaps the photo of Vittorio and Woody together. I wonder what that light is behind them.

 

Woody is also doing the rounds in French newspapers:

 

http://www.woodyallenpages.com/2016/05/new-woody-allen-kristen-stewart-french-interviews-for-cafe-society/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Premieres tonight at Cannes. I believe I read 7.30 PM local time.

 

Pictures from the press conference:

 

http://www.theguardian.com/film/gallery/2016/may/11/cannes-2016-woody-allen-kristen-stewart-blake-lively-in-pictures

 

Vittorio Storaro has spoken to Le Monde, but the interview is behind the paywall. The article is 2 euros:

 

http://www.lemonde.fr/festival-de-cannes/article/2016/05/11/vittorio-storaro-je-crois-aux-affinites-electives_4917228_766360.html

 

There are tons of coverage around. And the first reviews are up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You’ve been awfully quiet; I presume you want to see the whole film before you speak?

 

 

I think people are very happy to talk about the great work of Vittorio but less happy in the context of Woody Allen.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I think people are very happy to talk about the great work of Vittorio but less happy in the context of Woody Allen.

 

It’s funny that you should say this because I was just reading that thread where someone asked about screenwriting. And just as this message board isn’t dedicated to that literary endeavour, neither are all these threads I started about Woody Allen, but rather about the cinematographical aspect of his work. So I was just wondering if David, like Mark Kenfield above and Satsuki before Mark, had any quick impressions of the cinematography from the trailer.

 

What about you, Freya? Any thoughts? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll be more than happy to talk about a movie that I've seen, but this one isn't even in release yet.

 

It is in France. And it will be shown in Seattle on 19 May 2016, as the non-competing part of the Seattle International Film Festival. Two dates are mentioned for the U.S.: 15 July and 29 July.

 

Everywhere I looked, the praise for what Storaro did here is quite high. There are at least three iconic shots mentioned, one in a motel lit only by candles (someone compared it to Barry Lyndon) and a dawn scene, if I remember that correctly, in Central Park. I can’t remember what the third one was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What about you, Freya? Any thoughts? :)

 

I think Storaro is one of the worlds greatest living cinematographers. I really like what he has to say about the subject too and his very different outlook and way of talking about cinematography. I think he has interesting things to say about the subject that make you think as opposed to people who waffle a lot trying to sound clever. I'm interested to see what he does next.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...