Jump to content

Best Cinematography You've Seen In A Comedy?


Max Field

Recommended Posts

It's not really a genre people go to for cinematography, but it's interesting to see all aspects of a project fully utilized even if people are only going for one thing. As in COMEDY has to be the primary genre, not "dramedy".

 

I personally enjoyed the look of Crazy Stupid Love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

My favorites are probably Chris Menges' work on "Local Hero" and "Comfort and Joy", and many Woody Allen movies, but those are all on the lower-key, naturalistic side, not really "lit" for comedy. Same goes for the comedies shot by David Watkin for Richard Lester, or Roger Deakins' work on the Coen Brothers movies.

 

I'm also a fan of William Fraker's work on comedies like "Heaven Can Wait" and "1941" but those either are romantic comedies (in the first) or period action comedies (in the second.)

 

And there's also the Wes Anderson films, which have some lovely cinematography by Robert Yeoman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I'm always impressed by parody films that really nail the look of the genre they're spoofing. Gerald Hirschfield's work on "Young Frankenstein" is a great example of that, and he has some great stories of finding that look.

 

Brandon Trost's cinematography in "MacGruber" is great, it looks like a big budget action film. His comedy work in general has a lower key and edgier feel that stands out from a lot of contemporary comedy work.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really enjoyed the cinematography in 'Some Like It Hot' by Charles Lang, it was Billy Wilder who went against the idea of shooting the film as a comedy, because the opening had to be very gritty and real, so that the audience believed that the characters were really scared. If you really think about how absurd the plot is, you would never have imagined it would've worked so well, that's just the pure genius of Wilder. Also the work done by Robert Elswit on Punch-Drunk Love.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

I like the camera work on "It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World", but not the shot design.

 

"Ishtar" was said to have good cinematography way back in the day when it was released. I thought it was okay. The movie itself apparently didn't do well, and I've always wondered if that was because it was shot like a drama instead of a comedy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you like Charles Lang, ASC, Criterion is putting out a blu-ray of his VistaVision western, "One-Eyed Jacks", partly shot in Monterey, CA.

I've never seen 'One-Eyed Jacks', but I particularly love The Ghost & Mrs Muir, added to the soundtrack by Bernard Herrmann, it's truly a great underrated film. I remember being completely enchanted by it, when I saw it on TCM some years ago.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

It's been a long time since I've seen that one but I recall it being very lovely. Have you ever seen "Portrait of Jennie" (1948)? Lush b&w cinematography by Joseph August, ASC. The shoot exhausted him (being a Selznick production) and he died right after he finished it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been a long time since I've seen that one but I recall it being very lovely. Have you ever seen "Portrait of Jennie" (1948)? Lush b&w cinematography by Joseph August, ASC. The shoot exhausted him (being a Selznick production) and he died right after he finished it.

 

Oopps responded to the wrong post...

Edited by John E Clark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you like Charles Lang, ASC, Criterion is putting out a blu-ray of his VistaVision western, "One-Eyed Jacks", partly shot in Monterey, CA.

 

It has been a million years since I've seen this film... so I can't comment on the cinematography, but I was so unimpressed by the story/acting, I've not been interested in seeing it again.

 

On the other hand, "Mutiny on the Bounty"(1962) fused in my preadolescent brain the desire to go to the South Pacific... Mumbles Brando notwithstanding...

 

Apropos this forum, Robert Surtees, who was the Bounty cinematographer, had a string of awards and nominations, including an Oscar for "Ben Hur"(1959).

 

Do "The Graduate"(1967) and "The Sting"(1973) count as 'comedies"?

Edited by John E Clark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My favorites are probably Chris Menges' work on "Local Hero" and "Comfort and Joy", and many Woody Allen movies, but those are all on the lower-key, naturalistic side, not really "lit" for comedy.

 

What exactly do you mean by "lit" for comedy? I understand different genres can have different styles, but is there always a set of guidelines for shooting for humorous tone?

 

Also thanks to everyone for your suggestions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What exactly do you mean by "lit" for comedy? I understand different genres can have different styles, but is there always a set of guidelines for shooting for humorous tone?

 

Also thanks to everyone for your suggestions.

Comedy often is lit very evenly avoiding shadows and contrast. Compare this to say, a crime drama which might have strong contrast, shadows and subdued or gloomy colors.

 

The traditional thinking is that shadows and darkness symbolize mystery and danger, and presumably evoke feelings of fear, isolation and sadness. The goal with comedy is normally the opposite. Rather it's to create a cheerful setting, reduce anxiety, and set the mood for laughter.

 

I don't think there are rules, and there are many great exceptions where comedies have used more dramatic lighting with very funny results. But that's the basic idea.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

Comedies tend to minimize the use of moodier lighting expect for story reasons, otherwise there is a tendency for a more "cheerful" tone, more high-key. In physical comedy, there is also the rule that you need to see the "gag" clearly.

 

It's a bit of a cliche though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

What exactly do you mean by "lit" for comedy? I understand different genres can have different styles, but is there always a set of guidelines for shooting for humorous tone?

 

Also thanks to everyone for your suggestions.

 

One does see stronger lighting in comedies when the comedy is parodizing a known genre, such as horror. Otherwise comedy tends to be less contrasty.

 

A for example of lighting parody for humor response, the late Gene Wilder and Peter Boyle, in Mel Brooks' "Young Frankenstein"(1974)

 

1409940127000-phxdc5-6gwqz0jcvv5tcxt6bc0

Edited by John E Clark
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

An exceptionally well lit and well shot comedy is another family favorite; "Kiss me Goodbye". It's a remake of a Brazilian film whose name I forget ... checking IMDb; Sally Field, James Caan, Jeff Bridges, a remake of "Dona Flor and Her Two Husbands"

 

Trailer for Kiss Me Goodbye;

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been a long time since I've seen that one but I recall it being very lovely. Have you ever seen "Portrait of Jennie" (1948)? Lush b&w cinematography by Joseph August, ASC. The shoot exhausted him (being a Selznick production) and he died right after he finished it.

 

I looked up the director, as I haven't seen the film and to my delight it was William Dieterle. I have seen a couple of his films: Devil & Daniel Webster, and The Hunchback of Notre Dame...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

In the making of documentary on the "Young Frankenstein" DVD, Hirschfeld says he would light the wide shots very contrasty and dark to set the sense of place and mood for the scene, but for the close ups he'd fill them in more so the comedy would play better. Sort of a way to have your cake and eat it too I guess.

 

Apologies in advance for the digression, but because I have the book handy: "...because I was satirizing the look of the original Frankenstein, I asked the lab to develop the negative to about a 7.2 Gamma to better match the more contrasty negative used for the original. The increased development time (equivalent to forcing or pushing) gave me the desired degree of contrast and decreased the amount of light needed for the F/4.5 stop that was used to carry the depth of the larger castle sets." - Image Control, Gerald Hrischfeld, ASC, p. 74

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the making of documentary on the "Young Frankenstein" DVD, Hirschfeld says he would light the wide shots very contrasty and dark to set the sense of place and mood for the scene, but for the close ups he'd fill them in more so the comedy would play better. Sort of a way to have your cake and eat it too I guess.

 

Apologies in advance for the digression, but because I have the book handy: "...because I was satirizing the look of the original Frankenstein, I asked the lab to develop the negative to about a 7.2 Gamma to better match the more contrasty negative used for the original. The increased development time (equivalent to forcing or pushing) gave me the desired degree of contrast and decreased the amount of light needed for the F/4.5 stop that was used to carry the depth of the larger castle sets." - Image Control, Gerald Hrischfeld, ASC, p. 74

 

So, it would seem that even in a comedy parody of a 'strong lighting' genre, the lighting is 'less strong' to support the comedic effect...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...