Jump to content
Petter Englund

85 filter or correct in post

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

New to film!

I have currently bought a Pentax K1000 35mm still camera to train my exposure skills before shooting my next short film on Super 16.

 

My question:

I'm shooting with tungsten balanced 5219 Kodak vision.

I'm planning on using this stock in daylight as well.

 

Can I get away with buying a cheap 85B filter (like a HOYA) on eBay since I'm on a budget, or am I better off shooting without any filter and correcting the white balance in post afterward?

 

I have no experience with how lasting a digitally scanned negative will be to color correction in computer.

 

I do not want to mess up my skin tones.

What's my best option?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Color correcting your footage is a simple job in post. It won't look exactly the same as having used an 85 filter, but most people won't notice the difference. Roger Deakins (among others) often doesn't use an 85 when shooting tungsten film stock outdoors.

 

Edited for accuracy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, when he uses film, Roger Deakins says on his forum that he almost always uses an 85 filter when he shoots film. An exception would be with "The Shawshank Redemption", for which he corrected in post because it apparently rendered cooler shadows.

 

I know that Emmanuel Lubezki corrected in post on "The Tree of Life", according to the American Cinematographer article: "He did not use an 85 filter because it “homogenizes” the complex color. Instead, he prefers to color balance in the timing."

Edited by Leon Liang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Correction: Deakins sometimes shoots with an 85 and sometimes shoots without. I found this in his forum:

"I do sometimes shoot without correction and sometimes with. I have found that there is a difference between shooting a tungsten balanced stock and correcting in the lab as opposed to correcting with a filter. When correcting with a filter the shadows are warmer than if you shoot without a filter. For a film like 'True Grit' I wanted warm shadows but for 'Shawshank' I wanted colder shadows and hence the choice to be made."

 

http://www.deakinsonline.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2871&p=15535&hilit=85+filter+shawshank#p15535

 

And here's the AC article for "Tree of Life": https://www.theasc.com/ac_magazine/August2011/TheTreeofLife/page1.php

Edited by Leon Liang

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Petter, this is a question that comes up over and over. So it's worth doing a search of the forum. If you paste your subject line into the search in the top right you will see some results. Read. Then some more evolved questions will come, and some interesting answers...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • CineLab



    Tai Audio



    Wooden Camera



    Visual Products



    New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment



    Gamma Ray Digital Inc



    Abel Cine



    Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS



    Glidecam



    Rig Wheels Passport



    Paralinx LLC



    Ritter Battery



    Metropolis Post



    Broadcast Solutions Inc



    Serious Gear


×
×
  • Create New...