Jump to content
Tyler Purcell

Blade Runner 2049

Recommended Posts

Blade Runner 2049.... Beautiful, Elegant and cinematic, but lacking the soul of the original movie. It's seemingly an 85 page script expanded into a 2hr and 47min movie, thanks to long shots/takes, exposition and meandering dialog, tries to mimic the original film, but misses the mark.

 

The story is about suppressing the idea that replicants can reproduce, meaning they can be considered sentient. This would cause havoc because they would get rights and not be slaves anymore. This in of itself is a cool idea (been told many times), but the film focuses too much on it and not enough on what the characters do outside of that particular story. This is what made the first movie so great, there was so much depth to the characters and what they did outside of the A plot. Not the case with this new movie and it really causes some trouble because you expect more and it's just not there.

 

Of course, the other major issue outside of it's extreme length, is that you know the outcome way before it's revealed. The plot is so paper thin, when the "twist" happens, you're like... yea I figured that out 2 hours ago! They just keep feeding you pretty shot after pretty shot, thinking you'll forget, giving you some action in between the dialog that's meaningless. Plus, without spoiling the plot, the movie feels like the beginning of a trilogy, rather then a one off. I felt the filmmakers were setting the stage for a much bigger project, which barely explored, but left me wanting a resolution, rather then a big open door that leads to nothing. I mean don't get me wrong it's well made, even more so then Arrival, which I really liked.

 

Deakins did a masterful job, it looks stunning. You can tell Deakins worked really hard with the set designers to integrate as much lighting into the set (practicals) as possible, which was a nice look. It appears he stuck with his usual roughly 35mm focal length, but on the bigger imager I'm sure it's more like a 50mm. Most of the lighting setups were amazing, I mean flat out beautiful. Very inventive stuff from lighting through what appears to be water and onto walls, so you can see the water/wave action on the walls. To lights that follow characters as they walk through the set. It's very clever stuff and took a lot of prep and I'm sure testing, to make it right. I love how Deakins shoots action scenes, he doesn't go for those shaky cam close up shots, he uses the same focal length, a lot of times even keeps it on the dolly still. It's just the way movies should be made and I wish he would shoot more action films, he brings a breath of fresh air to the genera.

 

I did think some scenes looked a bit "videoesque" probably due to a lower shutter speed in dark moments. It did break me out of the story a bit in some cases because it seemed like something was wrong but it was just a decision. I was also upset Warner didn't release it in 2.20:1 aspect ratio, that was a fail for other cinematographers because I would have loved to have seen the full imager instead of it always being cropped.

 

In terms of the other aspects, the music was reminiscent of the original movie, which was nice. I did feel some moments were too strong, but over-all the score worked well. I'm a stickler for a good score and Hans Zimmer did a great job. The effects were also stunning and I hate VFX, but man did they do a good job. The entire time I was saying to myself, what if they had this much money on Arrival, how much better would it have looked. I loved the mix of practical with models with CG, it was a perfect blend. Where I wasn't a fan of the CG characters in the movie, it was more because they weren't necessary, rather then the quality of the finished product. The effects crew can be proud of this achievement and outside of Christopher Nolan movies, I can't think of another filmmaker who has done such a good job bringing all these elements together in modern times. It great to see and I truly hope they're rewarded with their stunning effort.

 

Now.... there wasn't a lot of good news to be said for the acting. I wasn't impressed at all with the cast or the direction of them. They all felt very stale and flat to me, my friend used the word "dull" and I would agree with her. Harrison felt distant, there were moments he and Ryan Gosling could have conversed about the past and really become friends, but those never happened. Ryan Gosling's character is also very flat and even though he has a relationship with a CG character, it's uninteresting and should have been deleted. It's as if they tried to make him so emotionless to make it more realistic, but it didn't play well at all. The other supporting characters were ok... but as my friend put it, you don't see anyone else BUT the lead/supporting actors. No extras, no bystanders, nothing! It's a city of millions, you see dots in the overhead shots but none near the actors. Oh well...

 

When leaving, I said to my friend, this thing isn't going to make it's money back. It's too damn long, it's too dull and frankly, people don't see serious Scifi films like this anymore. The box office for friday was miserable and I bet it stays that way. I bet it makes 30M this weekend, 8M next weekend and dies off by the 3rd weekend. The reviews are good, but the word of mouth is so-so and unfortunately, I'm gonna be another one of "those guys" giving it a mediocre review.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I seen it yesterday and I had a great experience. Love that movie! Amazing job from Villeneuve, Deakins and the CGI team! And that soundtrack, wow!! People should go see it in theatres and judge for themselves. This is not an ordinary movie... It very special. Pretty sure it will do really well in the box office for weeks to come.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was going to see it, but at three hours long, that falls into the Netflix category for me. That way I can pause it when I need to. It did fall short of financial expectations, but how can anyone be surprised? The current youth that see movies have no clue what a "Blade Runner" is.

 

And I guess since this movie relied on Canadians to direct and star in it, it's proof what presidents keep saying about immigrants who come to America....they are doing the jobs Americans refuse to do. :)

 

R,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours?

 

Crap...

 

It's rated R?

 

Crap, can't take the kids.

 

... and has women making out with each other?

 

Crap, definitely can't take the kids or the wife.

 

Guess it's one to watch on the computer.

  • Downvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I did think some scenes looked a bit "videoesque" probably due to a lower shutter speed in dark moments. It did break me out of the story a bit in some cases because it seemed like something was wrong but it was just a decision. I was also upset Warner didn't release it in 2.20:1 aspect ratio, that was a fail for other cinematographers because I would have loved to have seen the full imager instead of it always being cropped.

Why would Warners release it in 2.20:1 when it was framed and composed for 2.40:1? The open gate sensor is 1.5:1 which is not generally a display AR

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The original film didn't do well on theatrical release.

 

The R rating is not too far off the AA rating that the 1982 film had in the UK.

 

Women making out with women is not that unusual in films these days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The original film didn't do well on theatrical release.

 

The R rating is not too far off the AA rating that the 1982 film had in the UK.

 

Women making out with women is not that unusual in films these days.

We're not in the UK.

 

And it's not unusual, mostly because of who makes films, not because of those who watch them. Good luck selling to Christian families in Flyover.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck selling to Christian families in Flyover.

 

Yeah, The Dove Foundation, didn't go for it:

 

"This film will not be awarded the Dove-Approved Seal due to the use of profanity in the form of a few F-bombs, as well as graphic violence, resulting in murder, and frequent nudity. However, this movie is an aesthetic masterpiece and advances a narrative that is thought provoking and ultimately redemptive."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, The Dove Foundation, didn't go for it:

 

"This film will not be awarded the Dove-Approved Seal due to the use of profanity in the form of a few F-bombs, as well as graphic violence, resulting in murder, and frequent nudity. However, this movie is an aesthetic masterpiece and advances a narrative that is thought provoking and ultimately redemptive."

I thought you were kidding but it's real. http://www.dove.org/review/12571-blade-runner-2049/

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ahrrr yes....
Jim Jannard 12-19-2011:

Ridley is one of my all time favorites. Blade Runner is my favorite movie. Alien is all world. To have Prometheus "Shot on RED" is such an honor.
http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?69064-Prometheus

So, er ... six years on, both Alien Covenant and Blade Runner 2048 were shot with the Alexa in scintillating (Hoik! Splat!) 2K!

Wonder Woman was shot on film....

Meanwhile, Aldi were recently selling 65" 4K TVs here for $A699.
Am I seeing a pattern here ... :rolleyes:

THREE HOURS?!!
Bah! It's gonna be Blu-Ray on 65 inches and like it!

By the way, I only got about 30 minutes into Alien Covenant before my eyes started to glaze over, and I pulled the plug on it. Did anybody here actually like it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're not in the UK.

 

And it's not unusual, mostly because of who makes films, not because of those who watch them. Good luck selling to Christian families in Flyover.

 

I suspect it's not intended for a family audience, although I do know Christians who watch quality films which have demanding content.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would Warners release it in 2.20:1 when it was framed and composed for 2.40:1?

If you watch the movie, you can see moments where the framing was clearly wrong. There appeared to be more information above and below the 2.40:1 framing. This is also evidenced in IMAX promotions which show a more 2:1 aspect ratio being used for laser projection theaters, which are a native 1.90:1.

 

The open gate sensor is 1.5:1 which is not generally a display AR

The imager on the Alexa 65 is a native 2.28:1 aspect ratio, similar as 5 perf 65mm. I don't know why they would shoot it in "full frame" and then crop it down, makes no sense.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's not that unusual to frame for different aspects ratios when shooting, it happened on a regular basis when shooting for TV during the transition between 4x3 to 16:9.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We're not in the UK.

 

 

Quite a few of us are. Even more of us are outside the US. Most of us make it clear in our profiles.

Try not to forget that this is an international forum.

There is a good deal of common ground between the ratings systems in the UK and the US and the age classifications are usually similar.

Some of us are also old enough to remember the original.

Edited by Mark Dunn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The movie was shot on regular Alexa's

http://www.icgmagazine.com/web/humanity-2-0/

 

From Article:

Deakins and Villeneuve concurred on shooting with ALEXAs (XT Studio, augmented by the Plus and Mini cameras) and capturing in 3.4K to Codex in MXF/Arrriraw. “We decided to shoot this open-gate, like Sicario,” Deakins shares. “I did shoot tests with the ALEXA 65, which produces fantastic images, but for this project it just didn’t feel right.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Abel Cine



    Wooden Camera



    Gamma Ray Digital Inc



    Metropolis Post



    Rig Wheels Passport



    Ritter Battery



    New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment



    Paralinx LLC



    Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS



    Serious Gear



    CineLab



    Visual Products



    Glidecam



    Broadcast Solutions Inc



    Tai Audio


×
×
  • Create New...