Jump to content
Killian Lassabliere

Hawk V-lite 1.33 on Bolex EBM

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

Next week I will be shooting for the first time on 16mm.

 

I'll be renting a Bolex EBM Super 16 ( PL mount ) as well as a Hawk V-Lite 16 Anamorphic 1.33. ( only one focal length for budget reasons ).

 

I've been looking all around the internet and I can't seem to find any information on that specific combo.

 

So I was wondering if any of you ever used a similar setup? I'm mainly concern about focusing on the fly without a monitor desqueeze ?

 

 

We'll be filming at two locations, one indoor ( natural light coming thought sheers ), and a rooftop at dawn/dusk.

 

I'm thinking about getting some Kodak Vision 3 250D. I read that it is recommended to overexposed quit a bit, ( which is the opposite of what I've been doing on digital ). Would you guys have any advice on how to expose in those lighting conditions?

 

Thanks a lot for your help,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

In terms of not having a desqeeze viewfinder, 1.33X squeeze isn't too drastic - so its still possible to compose with care when looking at a squeezed image.

 

I used a 1.33X anamorphic back in the miniDV days to shoot 16:9 on 4:3 cams. Once you get your eye in, its surprising how quick you adapt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll be renting a Bolex EBM Super 16 ( PL mount ) as well as a Hawk V-Lite 16 Anamorphic 1.33. ( only one focal length for budget reasons ).

 

I've been looking all around the internet and I can't seem to find any information on that specific combo.

 

Probably because most productions with the budget to rent Hawks would rent a more modern S16 camera, and PL isn't the standard mount on Bolexes. Also the Bolex prism introduces aberrations when shot at apertures under about f/3.5, which is why it's generally better to use RX lenses on a reflex Bolex, at least for focal lengths under 50mm. Since they open to f/1.5, you might want to test a V-lite 16 on the EBM first to see how noticeable the abberrations are if you want to shoot at larger apertures.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the answers,

 

 

Probably because most productions with the budget to rent Hawks would rent a more modern S16 camera, and PL isn't the standard mount on Bolexes. Also the Bolex prism introduces aberrations when shot at apertures under about f/3.5, which is why it's generally better to use RX lenses on a reflex Bolex, at least for focal lengths under 50mm. Since they open to f/1.5, you might want to test a V-lite 16 on the EBM first to see how noticeable the abberrations are if you want to shoot at larger apertures.

 

I will do some tests when picking up the lens, ( hopefully I'll be able to spot any aberrations thought the unsqueezed viewfinder )

 

Thanks !

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You should really do an actual film test first.

 

Yes that's true !

 

I should of mentionned that the pretext of this shoot is to try out 16mm film, I'm paying for it myself so no clients are involved.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Serious Gear



    Metropolis Post



    Gamma Ray Digital Inc



    Tai Audio



    Abel Cine



    Glidecam



    New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment



    Rig Wheels Passport



    Broadcast Solutions Inc



    Ritter Battery



    Visual Products



    Paralinx LLC



    Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS



    Wooden Camera



    CineLab


×
×
  • Create New...