Jump to content
Bruce Royce

RED MINI-MAG - Things you only thought you knew. Inside view, and RED SSD firmware

Recommended Posts

RED claims they "invented" the RED MINI-MAG device (here: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?147759-Cheap-third-party-Red-MiniMag-replacement-JinniMag&p=1649970&viewfull=1#post1649970)

And they developed their own IP and SSD firmware for it, and that RED MINI-MAG has significantly less card errors than other companies using even reputable generic media, (and so theirs is superior to a generic one) and RED spends millions of dollars testing, certifying and QCing every media they ship. (here: http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?147759-Cheap-third-party-Red-MiniMag-replacement-JinniMag&p=1649669&viewfull=1#post1649669)

Red claims the RED MINI-MAG device is made in USA. 

(footnotThis) is a link to Micron's response regarding RED claims for having a customised firmware on the RED MINI-MAG device.

type=3&theatere 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think we ever thought the situation was anything different to that, did we?

P2 cards are four SD cards, for instance. Many companies have effectively repackaged commercial flash. I understand why they do it to a degree; they want to avoid being blamed for problems created by poor-quality storage, but as the general standard of NAND flash devices gets better and better there is less and less justification really.

P

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Phil Rhodes said:

I don't think we ever thought the situation was anything different to that, did we?

I think the issue here is the deception and the fake outrage from Jarred Land. If it wasn't so obviously hypocritical, it might be easier to sympathize.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So, what about "we invented" part? or "we developed our firmware"? or being unlike "other companies using generic media" part?
And what about the false capacity? (the capacity manufacturer states is the Max. LBA Unformatted, so don't give me formatting story)
What about "MADE IN USA" so they can unfairly take advantage of Buy American Act (BAA)?
What about saying this is patented (generic SSD in a box is patented?!!)
What about claimg Red write VERY differently on a card than a normal SSD is programmed for?
What about making false monopoly? Hurting third party businesses?  Abusing trust of their own customers...

You are not seriously suggesting all these are expected and fine. Are you?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even with all of Red's proprietary 1st party accessories, their cameras are awfully glitchy....

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Bruce Royce said:

You are not seriously suggesting all these are expected and fine. Are you?

 Phil's point is that RED are not the first manufacturer to have repackaged off the shelf components into a proprietary format, and they won't be the last. I agree that it's very annoying, and I find Jarred Land's deliberate deception and pretend outrage rather distasteful, but it's not surprising.

From reading some of the rest of the thread on REDuser, it seems you have a vested interest in this argument, so in the interests of transparency, perhaps you could explain your reasons for posting this here.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the important thing to consider in the context of Red's rather shrill complaints about this is what the purpose of intellectual property rules actually is.

The reason we allow people (limited) exclusivity on their inventions is to encourage inventions. 

Does Red's storage system represent a particularly useful innovation, embodying any new discoveries or novel techniques?

Not really. It's a flash card. Lots of manufacturers make flash cards that could do much the same job. There's something to be said here about the more general problem of patent law and the behaviour of companies that use it. I wouldn't go so far as to call this patent trolling, particularly, as they're not trying to stop people making flash cards in general, but it might be a case of patenting a design which only exists for the purpose of making the design patentable.

That doesn't encourage anyone to do original or useful work. It encourages people to spend more money on patent lawyers than they do on R&D. It's profoundly counterrevolutionary in terms of what intellectual property law is supposed to do. In the end, it retards progress.

Legal professionals might make other arguments, and big expensive productions will always be cautious, which is completely understandable. In my view, though, something as simple as a flash card is something that should quite reasonably be open to competition.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Gamma Ray Digital Inc



    Broadcast Solutions Inc



    Serious Gear



    Visual Products



    Paralinx LLC



    FJS International



    Glidecam



    New Pro Video - New and Used Equipment



    Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS



    Metropolis Post



    Just Cinema Gear



    CineLab



    Wooden Camera



    Ritter Battery



    Tai Audio



    Rig Wheels Passport



    Abel Cine



    G-Force Grips


    Cinematography Books and Gear
×
×
  • Create New...