Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 (edited) B&W digital is a mass of gray gradations. To emulate film better they need to make less gradations with digital B&W and develop an organic grain structure. Even if they can't do the grain well, the cutting back on the gradations would be a big help. I think it was William Klein who said it best...'**(obscenity removed)** the mid-tones.' Edited February 8, 2020 by Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil Connolly Posted February 12, 2020 Share Posted February 12, 2020 Less graduations you say? I give you 1 bit black and white - the least amount of graduations possible (outside of a Spinal Tap Album Cover) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel D. Teoli Jr. Posted February 12, 2020 Author Share Posted February 12, 2020 No, not litho. Just less gradations than standard digital. You study up your old BW film then compare to modern digital and you will see. The digital has a plastic look to it. ...of course this presupposes you want to emulate film. If you like the digital look then it would be a step backwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuart Brereton Posted February 13, 2020 Share Posted February 13, 2020 On 2/8/2020 at 1:54 PM, Daniel D. Teoli Jr. said: . To emulate film better they need to make less gradations with digital B&W So, just increase the contrast? Doesn’t seem like something you’d want done destructively when it’s simple to add in post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ Young Posted February 15, 2020 Share Posted February 15, 2020 Part of the appeal to shoot large format film was the beautiful gradations and finer grain. If grain is all that matters, than adding it to a digital image in post is easy today. I thought Dark Waters was shot on film, mostly because Ed Lachman prefers that format, but was astonished when I found out it was shot digitally and made to look like film in post. Remember Yedlin! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manu Delpech Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 It's funny, I was shocked by how video looking Dark Waters is, and he made it clear he didn't like the experience ? Adding grain is not enough, you can't just add a layer of fake grain and expect it to look like film, I mean, obviously. There's always a difference (and yes, even when Yedlin does it, still looks like digital), how can you mimic perfectly film grain when it's random, every frame being different, and it's about more than grain. Dark Waters used LiveGrain, which I was stunned to see considering LiveGrain has been used on plenty of shows and films and yet it's barely perceptible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJ Young Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 7 hours ago, Manu Delpech said: It's funny, I was shocked by how video looking Dark Waters is, and he made it clear he didn't like the experience ? Adding grain is not enough, you can't just add a layer of fake grain and expect it to look like film, I mean, obviously. There's always a difference (and yes, even when Yedlin does it, still looks like digital), how can you mimic perfectly film grain when it's random, every frame being different, and it's about more than grain. Dark Waters used LiveGrain, which I was stunned to see considering LiveGrain has been used on plenty of shows and films and yet it's barely perceptible. Must be a matter of taste then! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now