Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I am trying to find out what lenses were used in the shooting of Terrence Malick's Badlands, but there seems to be no info available on this topic. I just know that three cameras were used during the production: Mitchell Bncr, Cameflex, and Arriflex.

Badlands was shot in 1972, does anyone know what lenses were common for any of this cameras around that time, specially for the Mitchell?

 

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member

One of the few photos of Malick from that production shows him looking through the eyepiece of a Mitchell BNCR. That would have been the camera used for sync sound, with the Arriflex used for MOS shots. The Cameflex I believe belonged to the third cinematographer to join the film after the first two left, and would have supplemented or replaced the Arriflex. The first cinematographer was Brian Probyn, a familiar surname here on the forum. ?

Most likely the Mitchell BNCR lenses would have been Bausch and Lomb Super Baltars or Cooke Speed Panchros. The Arriflex might have used Zeiss Standards, perhaps an Angenieux 25-250. The Cameflex might have also used Zeiss lenses, or Cookes, or even Kinoptiks.  

Badlands was a thoroughly independent movie, with Malick scraping together the funds to make it, and going over budget and way over time. At one point a fire destroyed some cameras. The equipment would have been whatever he could get his hands on, and may well have changed over the course of shooting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Premium Member
6 hours ago, David Mullen ASC said:

B&H Baltars and Cooke Panchros were common back then in terms of primes. Zeiss Standard Speeds. Maybe Canon K-35's. Some adapted still lenses.

I don't think Canon K-35s were available yet in 1972, when Badlands was shot. According to the internet Kubrick supposedly used them on Barry Lyndon (which began shooting in 1973), but in the AC article on Barry Lyndon John Alcott only mentions using "the Canon T/1.2 lens". I suspect Kubrick sourced an early prototype K-35, or adapted one of the three high speed FD lenses that were the design basis for the K-35s, but Canon didn't officially release the K-35s until 1976.

Edited by Dom Jaeger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those are great answers! Much appreciated!!

I was also wondering about what filters might have been used on the lenses; in Badlands there is one shot in particular where I personally believe a ND grad filter was used, and I would like to ask your opinion on it:

1753023517_SHOT77.thumb.jpg.a3f9a8b7d0eaf2243adf8679388f3dd8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish I could ask my old man !.. he started the film and it was a pretty bumpy ride with Maliks inexperience I heard .. in the end my dad got an ulcer but didnt leave due to any big falling out , and was given the Cadillac after the shoot which he drove alone the west coast .. Malik is in Badlands as a friend who comes to the door of the rich guy and Kit answers  , apparently the actor who was meant to do it just didnt turn up !.. all I can remember is the old man was over exposing all the hot day ext by 2 stops and "printing down"..and that was kept during the shoot .. and he shot the house burning stuff too .. I think he shot most of it and has the top credit, (Tak Fujimoto was the AC  and did some shooting after the old man went to hospital )..or that was just in his contract .. he was flown over from the UK and when he got there there was basically no lights ! as Malik thought he didnt use them.. great film but he really was very green when he made it, straight out ion film school virtually .. and there was alot of upside down slates going on .. but still personally I think its his best film  regardless of any family tie .. the music is fantastic and two un known young actors .. he had lots of slides but many seemed to be of Sissy Spacek  and of him taken by her mmmm..  she did end up marrying the art director I believe ..

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2021 at 3:58 PM, Miguel Roman said:

Those are great answers! Much appreciated!!

I was also wondering about what filters might have been used on the lenses; in Badlands there is one shot in particular where I personally believe a ND grad filter was used, and I would like to ask your opinion on it:

1753023517_SHOT77.thumb.jpg.a3f9a8b7d0eaf2243adf8679388f3dd8.jpg

I don't think it is personally.. its just shade 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Robin R Probyn said:

I wish I could ask my old man !.. he started the film and it was a pretty bumpy ride with Maliks inexperience I heard .. in the end my dad got an ulcer but didnt leave due to any big falling out , and was given the Cadillac after the shoot which he drove alone the west coast .. Malik is in Badlands as a friend who comes to the door of the rich guy and Kit answers  , apparently the actor who was meant to do it just didnt turn up !.. all I can remember is the old man was over exposing all the hot day ext by 2 stops and "printing down"..and that was kept during the shoot .. and he shot the house burning stuff too .. I think he shot most of it and has the top credit, (Tak Fujimoto was the AC  and did some shooting after the old man went to hospital )..or that was just in his contract .. he was flown over from the UK and when he got there there was basically no lights ! as Malik thought he didnt use them.. great film but he really was very green when he made it, straight out ion film school virtually .. and there was alot of upside down slates going on .. but still personally I think its his best film  regardless of any family tie .. the music is fantastic and two un known young actors .. he had lots of slides but many seemed to be of Sissy Spacek  and of him taken by her mmmm..  she did end up marrying the art director I believe ..

That's quite interesting! About the over exposing in Badlands, in one of his rare interviews Malick says “I overexposed the negative and then printed it with very low contrast, so that even in exterior shots with natural light the characters never need to be lighted by reflectors.” So I guess that's why he wasn't using that much artificial light, although depending on the shots (and therefore, depending on who of the three dps shot them) it can clearly be seen the use of lights. And as you said, Spacek ended up marrying Jack Fisk, the art director in Badlands and most of Malick's films, some of David Lynch's, Paul Thomas Anderson's, etc.

Any chance of seeing some of those slides that you mentioned?? That would be great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Robin R Probyn said:

I don't think it is personally.. its just shade 

It does look like the tree's own shade...but when I look at the sky on the background I can see a difference in the contrast of the top of the image and the middle of the frame, as well as the right grey post at the edge of the frame...

Edited by Miguel Roman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Miguel Roman said:

That's quite interesting! About the over exposing in Badlands, in one of his rare interviews Malick says “I overexposed the negative and then printed it with very low contrast, so that even in exterior shots with natural light the characters never need to be lighted by reflectors.” So I guess that's why he wasn't using that much artificial light, although depending on the shots (and therefore, depending on who of the three dps shot them) it can clearly be seen the use of lights. And as you said, Spacek ended up marrying Jack Fisk, the art director in Badlands and most of Malick's films, some of David Lynch's, Paul Thomas Anderson's, etc.

Any chance of seeing some of those slides that you mentioned?? That would be great!

Interesting Malik mentions the over exposing , but it definitely wasn't his idea ? and it wasn't to avoid using lights or reflectors.. I do remember my dad saying he wanted a sort of washed out , hot , bland look to the day exteriors day shots  and that Malik was very concerned when they sure some un corrected rushes. Yes they did use lights  just that when the topic of the lighting budget came up Malik has been surprised he used lights at all !... my dad was from documentary work and had done alot of the BBC "Wednesday Plays" with Ken Loach ,and then Poor Cow ,Loaches first feature film .. there was a whole new wave of a more naturalistic lighting in the 60,s early /70,s .. presumably Malik had checked out his work and thought he just didn't light anything ....he had shot Down Hill Racer before Badlands too .. maybe he was basing the no lights idea around that film .. which of course used lights .. Malik was just very green then .. 

Sorry I don't have the slides , hopefully my brother in the UK still has them ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Robin R Probyn said:

Interesting Malik mentions the over exposing , but it definitely wasn't his idea ? and it wasn't to avoid using lights or reflectors.. I do remember my dad saying he wanted a sort of washed out , hot , bland look to the day exteriors day shots  and that Malik was very concerned when they sure some un corrected rushes. Yes they did use lights  just that when the topic of the lighting budget came up Malik has been surprised he used lights at all !... my dad was from documentary work and had done alot of the BBC "Wednesday Plays" with Ken Loach ,and then Poor Cow ,Loaches first feature film .. there was a whole new wave of a more naturalistic lighting in the 60,s early /70,s .. presumably Malik had checked out his work and thought he just didn't light anything ....he had shot Down Hill Racer before Badlands too .. maybe he was basing the no lights idea around that film .. which of course used lights .. Malik was just very green then .. 

Sorry I don't have the slides , hopefully my brother in the UK still has them ! 

About the choice of your father as cinematographer, Malick says “He is an excellent cameraman. I mean, he is a sort of pioneer in soft 'light technique, and I had always admired his work.” So I guess that combined with the documentary background would make him quite an ideal candidate for an independent shooting like Badlands.

Please let us know if your brother can find the slides!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Miguel Roman said:

About the choice of your father as cinematographer, Malick says “He is an excellent cameraman. I mean, he is a sort of pioneer in soft 'light technique, and I had always admired his work.” So I guess that combined with the documentary background would make him quite an ideal candidate for an independent shooting like Badlands.

Please let us know if your brother can find the slides!

Do you have a link to the article about Badlands .. I would be interested to have a look .. thanks  .. Im not in the same country as my brother but I can give it a try ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Robin R Probyn said:

Do you have a link to the article about Badlands .. I would be interested to have a look .. thanks  .. Im not in the same country as my brother but I can give it a try ..

This last sentence about the soft technique comes from a transcript of a master class “A Master Class with Terrence Malick” at the AFI, in 1976. It can be found in a book called All Things Shinning: An oral history of the films of Terrence Malick (Paul Maher Jr., 2017). I only have the physical book, so I can not link it; but besides that sentence there is only a few references to your father:

He is an excellent cameraman. I mean, he is a sort of pioneer in soft 'light technique, and I had always admired his work. IT was difficult. I mean, he is 55 years old or so, and I was just a kid. And I didn't know what I was doing. this was on-the-job training. But I should right there have taken things in hand, and I didn't, and then the same thing sort of happened with the second person. We sort of mutually got fed up with each other. And the third person, who used to be an instructor here, was my instructor in cinematography.

[…]

QUESTION: Why did Brian Probyn leave the production? 

Malick: Well, it sort of - he got quite exhausted and developed a bad case of ulcers at the same time that we weren't getting along. It was quite hot where we were shooting. It was what used to be the dust bowl.

QUESTION: How much of the film had Probyn shot before he left?

Malick: About a third. Each of them [Probyn, Fujimoto and Larner] shot about a third. Almost exactly. It just worked out that way. 

[…]

(…) if you get somebody with a documentary background like Steve Larner he didn't need anybody...the people he had, they were mainly to hold things that he stuck in their hands so they could be high school students. But that couldn't have happened with Brian Probyn, for instance, who was used to woking in a different way. His interiors look better, I'm sure, for their preparation than Larner's would given the way he had to work.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Miguel Roman said:

This last sentence about the soft technique comes from a transcript of a master class “A Master Class with Terrence Malick” at the AFI, in 1976. It can be found in a book called All Things Shinning: An oral history of the films of Terrence Malick (Paul Maher Jr., 2017). I only have the physical book, so I can not link it; but besides that sentence there is only a few references to your father:

He is an excellent cameraman. I mean, he is a sort of pioneer in soft 'light technique, and I had always admired his work. IT was difficult. I mean, he is 55 years old or so, and I was just a kid. And I didn't know what I was doing. this was on-the-job training. But I should right there have taken things in hand, and I didn't, and then the same thing sort of happened with the second person. We sort of mutually got fed up with each other. And the third person, who used to be an instructor here, was my instructor in cinematography.

[…]

QUESTION: Why did Brian Probyn leave the production? 

Malick: Well, it sort of - he got quite exhausted and developed a bad case of ulcers at the same time that we weren't getting along. It was quite hot where we were shooting. It was what used to be the dust bowl.

QUESTION: How much of the film had Probyn shot before he left?

Malick: About a third. Each of them [Probyn, Fujimoto and Larner] shot about a third. Almost exactly. It just worked out that way. 

[…]

(…) if you get somebody with a documentary background like Steve Larner he didn't need anybody...the people he had, they were mainly to hold things that he stuck in their hands so they could be high school students. But that couldn't have happened with Brian Probyn, for instance, who was used to woking in a different way. His interiors look better, I'm sure, for their preparation than Larner's would given the way he had to work.  

Oh great thanks for the quotes .. I actually thought he shot more than 1/3rd .. thanks for taking the time to do that .. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

@Robin R Probyn Hello Robin, I found an interview of your father and I thought you might be interested in reading it; it was published on 1975, in the magazine Cinema PapersI am posting the link to the entire magazine, the interview appears in the pages 73, 74 and 75.

https://issuu.com/libuow/docs/cinemapaper1975marno000/79

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, Miguel Roman said:

@Robin R Probyn Hello Robin, I found an interview of your father and I thought you might be interested in reading it; it was published on 1975, in the magazine Cinema PapersI am posting the link to the entire magazine, the interview appears in the pages 73, 74 and 75.

https://issuu.com/libuow/docs/cinemapaper1975marno000/79

Hi Miguel .. wow great many thanks .. I just listened to the Chris Menges , Roger Deakins podcast and they mentioned my dad quite alot ,as Menges was his assistant on Poor Cow and I think the first few shoots Chris Menges worked on ..  anyway thank you again sir  !  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Robin R Probyn said:

Hi Miguel .. wow great many thanks .. I just listened to the Chris Menges , Roger Deakins podcast and they mentioned my dad quite alot ,as Menges was his assistant on Poor Cow and I think the first few shoots Chris Menges worked on ..  anyway thank you again sir  !

You are welcome Robin, I will definitely check that podcast that you mention!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

In the tree shot, I would guess an ND grad was used. Brian was not averse to popping those things on when he thought about it. 

Brian's rushes often looked crap - as you'd expect when things were over exposed two stops. The producers would often have to see graded sections before they calmed down. I have no doubt that this was Brian's idea for achieving the look that Malik wanted and I doubt Malik had the experience to know that this would wash out the blue sky but also reduce the need for fill lighting or reflectors.

Brian came to prominence in a period in the UK when films were looking more and more realistic and unlit - whatever the actual technique used. Ken Loach's Days of Hope was (and still is)one of the most naturally lit things I had seen and was incredibly influential for lighting cameramen at the time. It was a decade or more before this look appeared in the US and there are still many many Hollywood films made which are lit like tennis courts.

There were a lot of other subtle things which Brian used to do which may have gone over Terry Malik's head due to youth and inexperience. One was Brian's very consistent use of different colour key and fill lights. He always tried to get a small blue/orange difference to shape the light in a room.

Another was his use of what he called "control words". At one point, when a director was asking for things Brian didn't agree with, Brian just made a small quiet comment. This was followed by 5 minutes of bluster from the director following which the director changed the scene and shot something different. I asked Brian about this later and he said "everyone has their control words. When it's getting over the top, you just need to drop a gentle hint using a control word and things should get back on track. You can't use them too often though."

There's mention on the different way of working between Brian and Steve Larner. Brian was the best DOP I have worked with in terms of running his part of the film. He was the "head of department" and made sure that his department worked well and did the best they could, even though everything else was falling apart. I've worked with DOPs where it was everyone for themselves and in-fighting all over the place. Brian was not like that. He was a father figure, both with discipline and advice.

The only odd thing, which perhaps started after the ulcers, was his overall level of calm on set. It was not uncommon for Brian to fall asleep, leaning on a light stand or ladder, while waiting for the rest of the crew to get ready for a shot and one of his trusties would gently wake him up before anyone noticed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Dermot McDermot said:

In the tree shot, I would guess an ND grad was used. Brian was not averse to popping those things on when he thought about it. 

Brian's rushes often looked crap - as you'd expect when things were over exposed two stops. The producers would often have to see graded sections before they calmed down. I have no doubt that this was Brian's idea for achieving the look that Malik wanted and I doubt Malik had the experience to know that this would wash out the blue sky but also reduce the need for fill lighting or reflectors.

Brian came to prominence in a period in the UK when films were looking more and more realistic and unlit - whatever the actual technique used. Ken Loach's Days of Hope was (and still is)one of the most naturally lit things I had seen and was incredibly influential for lighting cameramen at the time. It was a decade or more before this look appeared in the US and there are still many many Hollywood films made which are lit like tennis courts.

There were a lot of other subtle things which Brian used to do which may have gone over Terry Malik's head due to youth and inexperience. One was Brian's very consistent use of different colour key and fill lights. He always tried to get a small blue/orange difference to shape the light in a room.

Another was his use of what he called "control words". At one point, when a director was asking for things Brian didn't agree with, Brian just made a small quiet comment. This was followed by 5 minutes of bluster from the director following which the director changed the scene and shot something different. I asked Brian about this later and he said "everyone has their control words. When it's getting over the top, you just need to drop a gentle hint using a control word and things should get back on track. You can't use them too often though."

There's mention on the different way of working between Brian and Steve Larner. Brian was the best DOP I have worked with in terms of running his part of the film. He was the "head of department" and made sure that his department worked well and did the best they could, even though everything else was falling apart. I've worked with DOPs where it was everyone for themselves and in-fighting all over the place. Brian was not like that. He was a father figure, both with discipline and advice.

The only odd thing, which perhaps started after the ulcers, was his overall level of calm on set. It was not uncommon for Brian to fall asleep, leaning on a light stand or ladder, while waiting for the rest of the crew to get ready for a shot and one of his trusties would gently wake him up before anyone noticed.

haha yes so true .. I did that job a few times, as well as doing the tea runs with the slate as a tray .. TBH I still think Badlands is Maliks best film to date .... the music is just so good ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Dermot McDermot said:

In the tree shot, I would guess an ND grad was used. Brian was not averse to popping those things on when he thought about it. 

Brian's rushes often looked crap - as you'd expect when things were over exposed two stops. The producers would often have to see graded sections before they calmed down. I have no doubt that this was Brian's idea for achieving the look that Malik wanted and I doubt Malik had the experience to know that this would wash out the blue sky but also reduce the need for fill lighting or reflectors.

Brian came to prominence in a period in the UK when films were looking more and more realistic and unlit - whatever the actual technique used. Ken Loach's Days of Hope was (and still is)one of the most naturally lit things I had seen and was incredibly influential for lighting cameramen at the time. It was a decade or more before this look appeared in the US and there are still many many Hollywood films made which are lit like tennis courts.

There were a lot of other subtle things which Brian used to do which may have gone over Terry Malik's head due to youth and inexperience. One was Brian's very consistent use of different colour key and fill lights. He always tried to get a small blue/orange difference to shape the light in a room.

Another was his use of what he called "control words". At one point, when a director was asking for things Brian didn't agree with, Brian just made a small quiet comment. This was followed by 5 minutes of bluster from the director following which the director changed the scene and shot something different. I asked Brian about this later and he said "everyone has their control words. When it's getting over the top, you just need to drop a gentle hint using a control word and things should get back on track. You can't use them too often though."

There's mention on the different way of working between Brian and Steve Larner. Brian was the best DOP I have worked with in terms of running his part of the film. He was the "head of department" and made sure that his department worked well and did the best they could, even though everything else was falling apart. I've worked with DOPs where it was everyone for themselves and in-fighting all over the place. Brian was not like that. He was a father figure, both with discipline and advice.

The only odd thing, which perhaps started after the ulcers, was his overall level of calm on set. It was not uncommon for Brian to fall asleep, leaning on a light stand or ladder, while waiting for the rest of the crew to get ready for a shot and one of his trusties would gently wake him up before anyone noticed.

Thank you for your comments Dermot! Could I ask you what was your role in Badlands? Did you use to work often with Probyn or Larner?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...