Joe Pooley Posted July 9, 2010 Share Posted July 9, 2010 (edited) How, then, would XL cameras deal with Tri-X? Would there be a similar problem with an underexposure of 2/3 an f/stop? Edited July 9, 2010 by Joe Pooley Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Carlile Posted July 10, 2010 Share Posted July 10, 2010 Depends on the camera. Tri-X is notched at ASA 250 in a filter "notchless" cartridge, so if the camera can read as high as 250 it will be exposed correctly at ASA 160. Any other camera, just cut a filter notch in the cartridge. That way it will be sure to read at ASA 160-- without the notchless lower ASA trick. If the camera can only go as high as 160, then any higher ASA film will be registered at ASA 160 too. Without a filter notch, there is the possibility that Tri-X will be read at ASA 100, due to the filter pin kickdown. Some XL cameras that only went up to 160 disabled this kickdown function, so that they could read correctly the higher speed daylight cartridged films like Tri-X and 'G.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shane Hubbard Posted July 24, 2010 Share Posted July 24, 2010 Auto Cameras will read Ektachrome 100D just fine. Manual Exposure cameras need adjusted. Watch here: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now