Robert Jackson Posted March 20, 2005 Share Posted March 20, 2005 I'm leaving Tuesday for a 9-day shoot in eastern Kentucky. The weather is apparently going to be rainy the whole time I'm there and I've got a few thousand feet of 5293 to shoot. I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions about how to shoot it? Is an 85 filter not a good idea under overcast skies? Any suggestions are welcome and appreciated. -Rob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Pytlak RIP Posted March 20, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted March 20, 2005 I'm leaving Tuesday for a 9-day shoot in eastern Kentucky. The weather is apparently going to be rainy the whole time I'm there and I've got a few thousand feet of 5293 to shoot. I was wondering if anyone has any suggestions about how to shoot it? Is an 85 filter not a good idea under overcast skies? Any suggestions are welcome and appreciated. -Rob <{POST_SNAPBACK}> If your 5293 (200T) is more than a few years old or hasn't been stored properly (refrigerated), I hope you ran some tests to be sure the film still looked good. You still should use the 85 filter to filter overcast daylight for a tungsten balance film. The low contrast lighting should look good. With older film, a bit of overexposure can help compensate for some of the effects of aging. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert Jackson Posted March 20, 2005 Author Share Posted March 20, 2005 If your 5293 (200T) is more than a few years old or hasn't been stored properly (refrigerated), I hope you ran some tests to be sure the film still looked good. You still should use the 85 filter to filter overcast daylight for a tungsten balance film. The low contrast lighting should look good. With older film, a bit of overexposure can help compensate for some of the effects of aging. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thank you. I got the film from Vic Alexander and he said it had been refrigerated and that he's tested it for chemical fogging, but I haven't tested it myself. I really appreciate your advice. I had been wondering whether or not I should go ahead and use an 85 filter. Again, thank you very much for your advice. -Robert Jackson Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now