Eugene Lehnert Posted August 31, 2005 Share Posted August 31, 2005 So according to Kodak's technical data on their website their 500T Vision 2 stock needs 80 ft candles to be exposed at normal. But this is based on a shutter angle of 170 degrees. So for the Bolex with it's 133 degree shutter and prism the light exposing the film is 1/80th of a second. Which is about 1.6667 times slower than 1/48th of a second. So therefore it should take 133 ft candles to expose film on an RX5 Bolex at an f-stop of 5.6? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Premium Member John Pytlak RIP Posted August 31, 2005 Premium Member Share Posted August 31, 2005 So according to Kodak's technical data on their website their 500T Vision 2 stock needs 80 ft candles to be exposed at normal. But this is based on a shutter angle of 170 degrees. So for the Bolex with it's 133 degree shutter and prism the light exposing the film is 1/80th of a second. Which is about 1.6667 times slower than 1/48th of a second. So therefore it should take 133 ft candles to expose film on an RX5 Bolex at an f-stop of 5.6? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, you need 80 footcandles with a 170 degree shutter opening and 24fps for a T-5.6 stop with a EI500T film. So for a 133 degree shutter opening: (170/133) x 80 = 102 footcandles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eugene Lehnert Posted August 31, 2005 Author Share Posted August 31, 2005 Yes, you need 80 footcandles with a 170 degree shutter opening and 24fps for a T-5.6 stop with a EI500T film. So for a 133 degree shutter opening: (170/133) x 80 = 102 footcandles. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yes, ok, and I'm using RX lenses so I'm not calculating for 1/80 of a second I'm calculating for 1/65. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dominic Case Posted September 1, 2005 Share Posted September 1, 2005 the light exposing the film is 1/80th of a second. Which is about 1.6667 times slower than 1/48th of a second. Not meaning to be picky, but 1/80th of a second is actually faster than 1/48th of a second, not slower. Still, you are correct in saying you therefore need more light. If a 170deg shutter is run at 24fps, then the exposure is 1/51th sec and a 133deg shutter will expose for 1/65th sec. But you can work out the light you need just from the angles. If you need 80fc at 170 deg, then you need (80 x 170/133) = 102fc at 133 deg. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now