Chrisley Tjiputra

... :lol: ... :D ... :P ... :rolleyes: ... :) ... :huh: ... <_< :angry: ... :ph34r: ... #@*%!

Hi,

I'm going to shoot the World Cup final match in German next month with my XL 2 and am wondering about what's the best setting to be use(e.g:Frame rate, shutter speed, preset) that often used by the operator of television's broadcast camera.

I'm not going to shoot it alone, I have two other assistant which the one will be shooting behind the team A's goalpost(wide shot & player close up) and the other one behind the team B's goalpost(also wideshot & player close up). I'm between the team A and B to get wideshot, so the editing will be much easier to find the best angle.

Any suggest will be appreciated, thanks!

I'd prefer super-16 more than HD in terms of latitude and better color correction in post production which the HD can craps out quickly when you do that. I don't own super-16 but am sure will look for it someday...(coz' am still satisfied with HD).

He...he...he... :)

Let's have a fun time for a while!

Have you ever think about the number that is taken to be used MOSTLY by nowaday's technology?

Lets have a guest...... Yes you're right, it's number 3!

These are some of the example:

>3 CCD Camcorder

>3 LCD GrandWEGA sony plasma TV

>3 or tri-band handphone

>3 G handphone

>3 Megapixel digital camera(it's poor now)

>3 or even 30 GB memory storage

>Playstation 3 game console(coming soon)

>Xbox 360

>MPEG 3 player

And that's all I can think of...

Can somebody else think of the other 3 that u know?

Let's have a fun B)

:) hai

i need to know about proper meter reading because iam not able to find any proper books or resourses which describes various aspects of meter reading,so i want to know about the basic principles in reading for different types of shots and also the reading styles of various dp's

Why don't you use the external light meter rather than in-camera light meter(I believe it's more accurate!)

As for camcorders, you could consider getting a really cheap and nasty DV camera.

Hey! Do you think with miniDV camcorder(high-end model off course) can't make a pleasing final result?

Mine is Canon XL-2, it was bought by my father one year ago, and it's not so bad to start off with this camcorder. My father then said:"You'll never regret this, because it's a broadcast-camcorder like quality, it has a lot of feature you could ask for, and it's perfect for the first time filmmaker like you."

See? I love this camcorder! It has so many manual control like: shutter speed, iris, gain, white balance, audio channel, audio gain, etc...(except 24fps <_< )

I'd recommend you to buy this camcorder IMHO :)

And if you have a big budget why don't get the better one! I'd like to have one if someday I can afford it :rolleyes:

OR you use the multiple camera "bullet time" approach, which could give you the desired 24 frames per second each with a 2-second exposure, but you'd need to accept the "virtual dolly" effect. And for a long sequence, you'd need each camera to expose a number of frames - 2 second exposures with a normal 1/48th sec pulldown - unlike the single-frame approach of the original "Matrix Effect" bullet time.

What do you mean? 24fps with 2 sec exposure?

I know that in 24fps mode, every second captures 24 frames. How is it possible to shoot 2 second

of exposure with 24fps?

Hello, I'm newbie in here and I'm very impressed with The Matrix movies I saw.

Here's my question:

How they could make such a smooth slow-motion fighting scene with great steadiness?

Were they using a high-speed Varicam or was it created by the computer animation?

and also can Varicam record in 1000fps?

Sorry for the rookie question, and correct me if I'm wrong :)