Jump to content

chuck colburn

Basic Member
  • Posts

    388
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by chuck colburn

  1. B U Should be PU. Most God awful camera work I've ever seen.

    Can't figure out why that Barf Cam style is so popular. First time I remember it was in some cop show from the early eighties. We would watch it and laugh are asses off at how bad it was. Some things and some people just won't die.

  2. Max,

     

    What is the Mitchell 14.5 lens you speak of? I don't recall them selling lenses under their name. I remember an Angenieux 14.5 mm lens for both cine and still camera use as I had one on my Exacta 35mm camera and use to service lots of them for cine use.

     

    thanks,

     

    Chuck

  3. Any camera can have a behind the lens filter. Bolex was doing it before there was a Panavision. The thing is that whatever lens is used has to be collimate for use with a behind the lens gel filter as the filter increases the flange focale depth optically about .0015". Doesn't sound like much but it wreaks havoc with wide angles and speed lenses.

  4. Sean,

     

    We used to yank them off of Ang. zooms all the time when the owner went from using an Auricon or whatever none reflexed camera to an Arri or whatever. I would think that Century Optics or some other lens repair facility would have a drawer full of them.

     

    Saw one on ebay a week or so ago. If you find one I could probally talk you thru on the mounting and the alignment of the mask.

  5. Hi Chuck,

     

    The Filmo's in PV's inventory are often used as Crash cameras, I wonder what they might use in place of a Geneisis (possibly with a factory made Nikon mount).

     

    Stephen

     

     

    Hi Stephen,

     

    Actually it's the Eyemo (35mm) used for crash cameras. The Filmo was the 16mm verstion. That's why it might be a bit tight on PV hardfronting it. lol

    Mayby the Geneisis will become the "Eyemo" for this century! Guess they better get on designing some new crash housings.

  6. Hi Jan,

     

    You forget, early Panavisions were rebuilt Mitchells. Arri's 2c's, 3's, 435's, Mitchell Mk II's, Fries Mitchells & Aatons have all been Panavised to date, why would Panavision not fabricate a PV lens mount?

     

    I think we have seen enough real photos, & who says that what we see today will actually hit the street as an identical product, 'did subject to change' end! I missed that if it did.

     

    My best,

     

    Exactaly Stephen.

     

    And did any of those after market PV mounts on whatever camera cause a lawsuit to be issued by Panavision? It's just a lens mount . Jezzy pezzy, if I had a lathe and a mill and you wanted a PV mount on your BH Filmo I'd build one for you. On second thought it might be a bit of a squeeze on the Filmo. lol

  7. You don't see them very often but C.P. offered a set of primes in the C.P. mount. If I remember right they were made by Canon, but I could be wrong about that. Also every so often you see the Angenieux 5.9mm prime in C.P. or Arri mount . This was a very good lens, f 1.8 I think and good rectalinear correction.

×
×
  • Create New...